You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 7953551? ago 

underground vaults with valuables that were raided

I think "salvaged" might be a more accurate term unless you cite a source that the gold was stolen

1
-1

[–] party1981 [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

I don't have smoking gun proof, but if you watch building 7 being demolished, in controlled demolition, you see that that it was some kind of inside job..

0
1

[–] 7954414? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I'm not making any claim whether or not it was an inside job. I'm talking about the gold recovery. There was no evidence it was stolen.

0
0

[–] samhara ago  (edited ago)

I studied it for over 10 years intensively. The government / Media story is 100% bullshit.

But this "Bld. 7" meme is total red herring.. "Bld 7" was demolished / brought down by its leaseholder Mr. Silverstein. He total the story himself on TV.. So they get the mainstream truthlings to repeat "Bld. 7" over and over as if it were evidence ; when it is not evidence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jPzAakHPpk "the smartest thing to do is to pull it. "

It wasn't hit by anything..Yes, it was demolished. The owner admitted it. That's no evidence.. How did they fool those suckers to repeat "bld 7" on and on for so many years.. Phew.

Read a good on the subject why don't you? https://www.abebooks.co.uk/911-Conspiracy-Scamming-America-James-Fetzer/14096480640/bd They got everyone to repeat the worst evidence.. How did they do that?