There has been a LOT of movement this weekend, which is summarized here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5savsy/breaking_report_pizzagate_pedo_crackdown_may_be/
This includes the return of FBIanon. And, having read the new (brief) FBIanon transcript, it sounds like the same FBI guys (Saudi/Israeli involvement, giant corruption through the federal government, etc.).
Well, all of a sudden, Wikileaks has tweeted out three (arguably four) cryptic tweets about "#vault7":
http://i.magaimg.net/img/1k5.png
Many people believe that these tweets relate to 9/11. For example, the third tweet says "When is #Vault7?" It shows a picture of a Whitney F119-PW-100 engine. Wikileaks also tweeted a video with an image of the 9/11 WTC crash and the text "friendly fire."
People are trying to decode these tweets over at r/conspiracy. But I believe that I have the best key to decoding them:
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/01/nyregion/a-nation-challenged-the-vault-below-ground-zero-silver-and-gold.html
Notice that the second "#vault7" tweet is about Nazi gold.
Among the many varieties of 9/11 conspiracy theories (which I became very informed in after #pizzagate and FBIanon in October), most of them observe that WTC6 (and WTC7?) had underground vaults with valuables that were raided.
Now, if we're on the right track here, it raises fascinating questions. Has WL turned into a conspiracy theory website? Why is WL sending out cryptic tweets? If they have the documents, why not just drop them?
Here's my theory: all of the #pizzagate activity, and the WL #vault7 tweets, are connected. FBIanon said that they hope and expect the arrests this week, but they are not guaranteed. FBIanon said that there is enormous pushback for them not to make arrests. Well, how can the FBI (and the good guys) push back?
Threaten to expose that 9/11 was an obvious false flag operation conducted by Mossad with the permission and knowledge of the neoconservatives in power during the Bush/Cheney administration, to essentially hijack the U.S. military for wars in the Middle East.
WL doesn't want to just drop the documents, because it would be hugely destabalizing, and could lead to war, even World War 3. That's what FBIanon said too. And this makes sense, because Israel is a nuclear power that reserves the right to the Sampson Option (nuclear bomb for Israeli self defense: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Samson_Option:_Israel%27s_Nuclear_Arsenal_and_American_Foreign_Policy)).
view the rest of the comments →
[–] party1981 [S] ago
Mossad is not a police force. It's a secret intelligence organization, parallel to the CIA.
The problem with your theory is that it doesn't help the United States to spend $5 trillion fighting and destroying Israeli's enemies in the Middle East: Iraq, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, Iran, etc. But it makes perfect sense for a small country, with a high IQ, surrounded by enemies and threats, to ramp up Muslim false flags to rally the U.S. military to help protect it.
The other problem is that 9/11 happened after the heavily Israeli neoconservatives got into power. That indicates that Israel was controlling the U.S., not vice versa. If the U.S. was just hiring Mossad to pull off 9/11, you don't need to fill your federal government with Israeli-connected neoconservatives.
Nobody is saying that "the Jews did it" or that all Jews are bad. We're saying that Mossad is corrupt, the same way that the CIA is corrupt, and Mossad did 9/11, with the permission of neocons. Of course, there are Skull and Bones, Wall St., and secret society connections (Rothschild). But the evidence for Mossad doing 9/11 is overwhelming. Not just executing it, but planning it for decades, and planning it for obvious motivations that benefit Israel.
[–] samhara ago (edited ago)
It's impossible for the "Mossad" to do 9/11 without the U.S. government. "The Risk of Winning: What Happens Once the 9/11 Sewer Opens Wide?" - https://nomoregames.net/2006/04/09/the-risk-of-winning-what-happens-once-the-911-sewer-opens-wide/ -
We are fighting a proxy war in the Mid - East not for the ostensible "Israelis" but for the British and German Zionist Bankers.
The "theory" as you call it, of "Israel " in charge of the U.S. is truly a Tail-Wags-the-Dog scenario. Here's from a Cabinet member of the Bush Admin: Morgan Reynolds, link above - from 10 years ago.
[–] party1981 [S] ago
There was U.S. government involvement. I never said there wasn't. So, right off the bat, you are not accurately representing my view.
Your long quote doesn't refute anything I have written here, nor does it address the higher-level arguments I have made for Israeli motivations.
[–] samhara ago (edited ago)
It doesn't matter what you believe "makes sense" It matter what really happened. I can tell you haven't read the citation. - http://www.septemberclues.info/historical.shtml -