You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] party1981 [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Right, it looks like the vault was under building 6, not 7. But see the correction at the end of the NYT article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/01/nyregion/a-nation-challenged-the-vault-below-ground-zero-silver-and-gold.html

Of course, if 6 has a vault, it's possible that 7 had a vault, and it just isn't well publicized.

The other theory for vault7 is that it refers to a seventh batch of FBI leaks from the FBI records vault. But I still prefer the WTC vault theory. I will watch the videos.

BTW, it's pretty clear that it was Mossad. Watch a Christopher Bollyn video on youtube.

0
4

[–] LostandFound 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Mossad appeared to play their part but there were many who stood to gain. Gold and silver are nice but why not take power if it's available to you.

it was discovered that concealed within Building Seven was the largest clandestine domestic station of the Central Intelligence Agency outside of Washington DC, a base of operations from which to spy on diplomats of the United Nations and to conduct counterterrorism and counterintelligence missions.

In 01 there were always some form of physical off site data backup. This is where they stored their data. Kurt found only dust in the opened vaults used by the occupants of wtc 7.

0
1

[–] samhara 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

There were massive bank transactions run through the computers there, within the Two Towers, in the minutes between the explosion and the dustification. Some hard drives were salvaged and examined at great expense, but the details of what was found was not released. The Insider Trading that took place the week before was traced to Deutche Bank by the 9/11 "Commission" but they rejected the evidence since the bank was not "terrorists" - they claimed.

0
1

[–] party1981 [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Right. It was a crime within a crime within a crime.