There has been a LOT of movement this weekend, which is summarized here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5savsy/breaking_report_pizzagate_pedo_crackdown_may_be/
This includes the return of FBIanon. And, having read the new (brief) FBIanon transcript, it sounds like the same FBI guys (Saudi/Israeli involvement, giant corruption through the federal government, etc.).
Well, all of a sudden, Wikileaks has tweeted out three (arguably four) cryptic tweets about "#vault7":
http://i.magaimg.net/img/1k5.png
Many people believe that these tweets relate to 9/11. For example, the third tweet says "When is #Vault7?" It shows a picture of a Whitney F119-PW-100 engine. Wikileaks also tweeted a video with an image of the 9/11 WTC crash and the text "friendly fire."
People are trying to decode these tweets over at r/conspiracy. But I believe that I have the best key to decoding them:
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/01/nyregion/a-nation-challenged-the-vault-below-ground-zero-silver-and-gold.html
Notice that the second "#vault7" tweet is about Nazi gold.
Among the many varieties of 9/11 conspiracy theories (which I became very informed in after #pizzagate and FBIanon in October), most of them observe that WTC6 (and WTC7?) had underground vaults with valuables that were raided.
Now, if we're on the right track here, it raises fascinating questions. Has WL turned into a conspiracy theory website? Why is WL sending out cryptic tweets? If they have the documents, why not just drop them?
Here's my theory: all of the #pizzagate activity, and the WL #vault7 tweets, are connected. FBIanon said that they hope and expect the arrests this week, but they are not guaranteed. FBIanon said that there is enormous pushback for them not to make arrests. Well, how can the FBI (and the good guys) push back?
Threaten to expose that 9/11 was an obvious false flag operation conducted by Mossad with the permission and knowledge of the neoconservatives in power during the Bush/Cheney administration, to essentially hijack the U.S. military for wars in the Middle East.
WL doesn't want to just drop the documents, because it would be hugely destabalizing, and could lead to war, even World War 3. That's what FBIanon said too. And this makes sense, because Israel is a nuclear power that reserves the right to the Sampson Option (nuclear bomb for Israeli self defense: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Samson_Option:_Israel%27s_Nuclear_Arsenal_and_American_Foreign_Policy)).
view the rest of the comments →
[–] bopper 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
What you're talking about is 'kinetic' energy, it would have been incredibly destructive. What Dr. Woods hypothesizes is that it was a precise surgical hit, by an energy weapon. Thus the buildings appear to be vaporizing and smoldering (turning to dust) rather than collapsing in on themselves.
This preserved the Hudson River dam next to the towers, which would have flooded Manhattan had it been breached. The dust made the first responders and others ill. You should check her out, I have come to believe she has it right, as do others (who are not busy ostracizing her).
[–] Rarestpepeofall 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
You are correct @bopper
[–] THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES ago
No. It was a thermonuclear weapon underneath the buildings. This aligns with isotope studies, especially tritium concentrations in the water, which can only be explained by a nuclear event, not by lasers or regular bombs. This is why 250,000 people have cancer.
[–] Rarestpepeofall 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Can't be thermonuclear if the the building a were dustified and paper survive d the the heat
[–] bopper ago
I will check out the clips you posted.