You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
2

[–] THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

You don't necessarily need wikileaks:

It is extremely likely that only first responders died from radiation poisoning. This low reality death count (50-100 max) was necessary to get some of our intelligence agencies on board. Suspend your disbelief. The goal of 9/11 was to cover up Project Hammer and missing Pentagon dollars, and to pit the population with the most guns and largest military on Earth, with Islam (unambiguous religion that poses large threat to "their" slave society). Additionally, it served as a symbolic masonic event, with symbolism beyond my understanding.

Dmitri Khalezov is a go-to USSR nuclear worker/officer on the matter:

http://www.911thology.com/nexus1.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUnjbCxhXh4YouTube

Simon Shack (Italian computer graphics analyst) painstakingly runs you through the shitty "live" computer graphics.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gORu-68SHpEYouTube

Basically, CIA turned a blind eye to the Mossad:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68LUHa_-OlAYouTube

This fits into the whole masonic order owning the world thing: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1491256

0
2

[–] gAvenger 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Not only do the two towers invoke the Masonic pillars, but WTC had an unambiguous Masonic third pillar on the grounds. The symbolism of the pillars as the gate to the new world is unequivocal. Frightening really. The implication was that the towers were design with the intent that someday they would be brought down. Makes me wonder if the engineering was selected for controlled demolition in the first place- i.e.: strategic weak points built into the structure. These fuckers.

0
0

[–] Votescam ago 

No -- reports are the WTC towers were going to have to be brought down as they were put up -- with scaffolding which would have cost a huge amount of money. There's precedent for this as one of the NYC towers has been brought down this way. Unfortunately, I no longer have the info on that and couldn't turn it up in a search so probably difficult for you to believe -- but true. But, the WTC towers were to be brought down because of Asbestos problems -- they were also White Elephants which weren't renting. Heating and cooling the buildings were an immense problem. Demolition wasn't to be permitted.

The WTC towers were built to withstand not just one commercial jetliner flying into it but a number of them.

Notice that they've scrubbed references to "built to withstand a number of jets flying into them." And that's true as the designers made clear after 9/11 -- describing it as "flies flying into a screen door." WTC Towers Designed to Withstand Impact of Loaded Boeing 707
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fQlC2AIWrY http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/design.html

0
0

[–] THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES ago 

According to the Russian officer, they were intended to be brought down with nukes, when they were built. That's why it worked so well. It was the designed method.

0
1

[–] crazysniffable 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I am also very intrigued by Dr. Judy Wood's directed energy attack theory.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ML8CJp9Ha14

0
0

[–] THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES ago 

No.

0
1

[–] samhara 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

And 9/11 was a Ritual event; The focusing of the intent and emotion of millions was part of what they do.

Love to hoax. And they massively "got off," likely literally, on the hoax factor of the "event"

Sure people died, but it was a ritual sacrifice, that's what they love; like they do on a smaller scale with children.

0
1

[–] samhara 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I'm not on board with the Nuke faction of researchers but the fact it was faked / done as a Propaganda tool to get people ready for war; by the Neo - Cons "Project for a New American Century" is just easily shown .

1
-1

[–] THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Nukes.