There has been a LOT of movement this weekend, which is summarized here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5savsy/breaking_report_pizzagate_pedo_crackdown_may_be/
This includes the return of FBIanon. And, having read the new (brief) FBIanon transcript, it sounds like the same FBI guys (Saudi/Israeli involvement, giant corruption through the federal government, etc.).
Well, all of a sudden, Wikileaks has tweeted out three (arguably four) cryptic tweets about "#vault7":
http://i.magaimg.net/img/1k5.png
Many people believe that these tweets relate to 9/11. For example, the third tweet says "When is #Vault7?" It shows a picture of a Whitney F119-PW-100 engine. Wikileaks also tweeted a video with an image of the 9/11 WTC crash and the text "friendly fire."
People are trying to decode these tweets over at r/conspiracy. But I believe that I have the best key to decoding them:
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/01/nyregion/a-nation-challenged-the-vault-below-ground-zero-silver-and-gold.html
Notice that the second "#vault7" tweet is about Nazi gold.
Among the many varieties of 9/11 conspiracy theories (which I became very informed in after #pizzagate and FBIanon in October), most of them observe that WTC6 (and WTC7?) had underground vaults with valuables that were raided.
Now, if we're on the right track here, it raises fascinating questions. Has WL turned into a conspiracy theory website? Why is WL sending out cryptic tweets? If they have the documents, why not just drop them?
Here's my theory: all of the #pizzagate activity, and the WL #vault7 tweets, are connected. FBIanon said that they hope and expect the arrests this week, but they are not guaranteed. FBIanon said that there is enormous pushback for them not to make arrests. Well, how can the FBI (and the good guys) push back?
Threaten to expose that 9/11 was an obvious false flag operation conducted by Mossad with the permission and knowledge of the neoconservatives in power during the Bush/Cheney administration, to essentially hijack the U.S. military for wars in the Middle East.
WL doesn't want to just drop the documents, because it would be hugely destabalizing, and could lead to war, even World War 3. That's what FBIanon said too. And this makes sense, because Israel is a nuclear power that reserves the right to the Sampson Option (nuclear bomb for Israeli self defense: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Samson_Option:_Israel%27s_Nuclear_Arsenal_and_American_Foreign_Policy)).
view the rest of the comments →
[–] party1981 [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Watch any Christopher Bollyn video on youtube and it will explain 9/11 pretty well.
The JFK assassination falls apart upon the slightest scrutiny too (watch a Jerome Corsi video on JFK, or the youtube video "From JFK to 9/11").
I didn't want to believe any of it either.
[–] 2impendingdoom 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
The LBJ mistress videos on youtube (she had a son with him) lays the JFK backstory all out. Why this happened in Texas is not coincidence.
[–] witch_doctor1 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
I'll check him out. Yeah, obviously JFK...I'm no fan of the Kennedy's (mainly because of Teddy, the only one not worth shooting)...but I watched a JFK speech on YT recently and damn...he would be way too conservative for any party right now. How far our politicians have fallen is stunning.
[–] party1981 [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Ted Kennedy gave us the 1965 Immigration Act.
[–] IPleadThe2nd 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
I never thought too much of JFK either until I listened to some of the last speeches he gave and learned that his last executive order was to create our own currency and essentially end the fed. He was killed right after and guess what the first EO his successor signed? To undo JFKs EO. I think he was a part of their club, but for whatever reason he woke up or had a change of heart. He tried to save us from our enslavement and they killed him.
[–] bopper 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Some of the "JFK to 9/11" is a little off, on Kennedy. For a great history lesson take a day or two, if so inclined, and watch at least the first several hours of Evidence of Revision. Rare footage you won't see anywhere else.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHb5X3fFhPw
[–] party1981 [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
It's the only JFK video I've seen - never looked into it before, so I had no way to vet it. Completely blew my mind. Multiple snipers, Mark Lane, body switching. It seems so obvious in hindsight.
[–] samhara ago
Chris Bollyn is not for real [ you will find many 'controlled op' along the way "What I Finally Understood" - http://mileswmathis.com/guru.pdf ] though he could be an alright "entry drug" into the study of "9/11." JFK may not be the close - to "Saint" people have been led to believe "If only he lived. If If If " Not. [Start with Lincoln to get a grip on the Kennedy ] Lincoln - http://mileswmathis.com/lincoln.pdf - JFK - http://mileswmathis.com/barindex2.pdf -
[–] party1981 [S] ago
Can you give me a specific reason why he isn't real (whatever that means?)?
He says 9/11 was Mossad, same thing that FBIanon said. Or you don't agree with FBIanon either?