Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] AreWeSure 5 points -3 points 2 points (+2|-5) ago (edited ago)
1 vote for no big deal
[–] IPleadThe2nd 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
I'm so happy that I get to down vote you now!
[–] nomorepepperoni 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Make this two votes. Please present something a little less of the ad-hominem, misleading-to-us "sex ring" tabloid fodder variety if you're going to imply concerns about Stone.
[–] AreWeSure 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
I'm not making an ad-hominem argument. And him being a swinger isn't the one I would use. The fact that the guy is has told us over and over and over again that he is a professional bullshitter is the one I would use. I not even responding to what he said. You guys want to believe Alex Jones and Roger Stone go right ahead.
I'm genuinely curious because I seen the term pervert thrown around here and some folks seems to be intensely religious and anti-sex. I've also seen the term cuck from time to time.
What do you mean about misleading to us? Stone eventually admitted the story was true in a new yorker article from 2008. (Oddly enough at the time of the article trump was feuding with stone.)