Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] jbdigriz 2 points 5 points 7 points (+7|-2) ago
So...was she the AG when Obama put a 6 month freeze on refugees in 2011?
If so, this is just another political move for show. She was going to be replaced anyway, so this is a show of loyalty to the powers opposing Trump. Makes a nice news story for them.
And even of she wasn't, this still reeks of hypocracy and showboating.
[–] PizzaGate711 2 points 3 points 5 points (+5|-2) ago
The Acting AG was an Obama appointee and was still working for Obama - not Americans. Obama is setting up a shadow government. Most likely she'll end up working now in Obama's shadow government. Obama Setting Up Shadow Govt. https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/civil-unrest/obama-setting-up-shadow-government-civil-unrest-will-lead-to-civil-war/ …
[–] Drnoway 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Oh come on. Obama is shadow governments puppet.
[–] AreWeSure 4 points -2 points 2 points (+2|-4) ago
That's a load of shit on many, many levels.
She was the acting Attorney General because she was asked by Trump to serve as acting AG. She was a member of the DOJ since the 1980's when Bob Barr hired her. You should look up Bob Barr.
She took an oath to the Consitution and working "for Americans" as you put it.
[–] PizzaGate711 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Be sure about this. Yates WAS an Obama appointee. And angry shills are awfully transparent.
[–] PizzaGate711 ago
Why do you think Trump sacked her again?
[–] sunajAeon 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Glad to hear this Obama puppet fired-good riddance
[–] waxdino 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Mother Jones, really? You know they are funded by Soros? Named after a woman that hated the rich, now funded by Soros, Clinton mouthpiece.
[–] sunajAeon ago
Like to see documentation on that very interesting assertion
[–] waxdino 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Made a post about it. Here you go: https://voat.co/v/whatever/1606533
[–] bopper 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Who is the man That would risk his neck for his brother man? (Shaft!) Can ya dig it? Who's the cat that won't cop out When there's danger all about (Shaft!) Right on You see this cat Shaft is a bad mother (Shut your mouth) But I'm talkin' about Shaft (Then we can dig it) He's a complicated man But no one understands him but his woman (John Shaft) sorry i couldn't help it
[–] AreWeSure ago
That song does not apply to Trump. There's only one possible President that song could apply apply to.
That's right. I'm talking about TAFT!
[–] bopper ago (edited ago)
He was Skull and Bones. (That was funny, maybe I need to read up on Taft, or not.) If you know Shaft you are showing your age, I saw it a drive-in.
[–] AreWeSure 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The Lawfare blog finds Yates's statement unpersuasive. She doesn't say why it isn't lawful. https://www.lawfareblog.com/quick-thoughts-sally-yates-unpersuasive-statement
Another writer on that site says given the above, she shouldn't have refused to defend the executive order, she should have resigned. https://www.lawfareblog.com/quick-thoughts-sally-yates-unpersuasive-statement
[–] nonoses 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Why are you linking Mother Jones?
[–] bopper 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
He just rolled some more heads. It's on Zero Hedge.