Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] Mellowmountain 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
love the mes series. and nice work on cracking the
[–] matheasysolutions [S] 0 points 1 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago
thanks!! And sweet Vault 7 graphic you made!
[–] Mellowmountain 0 points 1 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago
the vault is too heavy... their ship will sink !
[–] Silverlining 0 points 1 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago
Congratulations on your initiative.
[–] matheasysolutions [S] 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago
Thanks!!
[–] ben_matlock 0 points 1 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago
Nice job, but perhaps your series shouldn't be so reliant on the McCann Case...plenty of other evidence out there to make a strong impression on the genpublic.
[–] matheasysolutions [S] 0 points 1 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago
Thanks! I wasn't planning to spend more than just a video or two on the McCann case but the rabbit hole just gets deeper. My philosophy is to go about everything as a lawyer so that the conclusions I make from each video are very hard to argue against. Also, I am going where ever the facts take me, while illustrating how the media has been covering up and lying for many years now.
So while I am moving a bit slow on the McCann case, I have noticed a lot of misinformation spreading about it, which the media has used to discredit alternative McCann case narratives, as well as New York Times and Snopes using the misinformation to try to "debunk" #PizzaGate.
[–] ZalesMcMuffin 0 points 1 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago
I haven't watched the vids yet, but I just have to chime in on that note. It's crucial to understand what we're in the middle of. This is an open source investigation, so anybody can participate, and that means the good, the bad, and the guilty. It is virtually guaranteed that disinfo will be sown. It is also virtually guaranteed that misinfo (which is just disinfo which someone believed) will be spread. There is no effective quality control mechanism. Therefore, it is absolutely to be expected that there will be bogus elements within the investigation. This is true regardless of whether or not any particular suspicion or accusation is true. The reason for that is that even if everything were false, trolls would still sow disinfo just to troll. (Trolls gonna troll!) So the existence of some false elements proves absolutely nothing whatsoever.
There is a saying that an argument has not been defeated until it has been refuted in its strongest form. This is essentially the flip side of logical fallacy. Pushing a fallacy is not refuting an argument in its strongest form, and thus it is not effective in defeating the argument. All it can do is muddy the waters. Ultimately, in a fair fight, logical fallacies backfire on the one deploying them. That is one goal in this fight: destroy all remaining credibility of those who have pushed the false narrative of PG being "fake news". The liars should be ground into fine powder -- rhetorically speaking, of course.
Now off to watch your vids.