0
2

[–] Millennial_Falcon [M] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

rule 3: title needs to describe content of post.

to answer your question, I deleted that post for overblown, sensationalized title (and asked submitter to repost)

0
0

[–] memegod420 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

But it didn't break rule 3, did it? It was a discussion post.

0
2

[–] Millennial_Falcon 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It may not be 100% clear from how the rule is written, but all posts need to have titles that describe the content. Discussion posts are just link posts that also include discussion/explanation, as they must include sources (links) as well.

"If you can't provide an accurate summary in the title of a Link post then you must submit it as a Discussion post where you provide the link with a brief description of the content."

So of course at bare minimum the title of any post needs to describe the content. The reason rule 3 is written that way is that it's saying sometimes an additional burden is required (i.e. posting as discussion post and summarizing content).

1
-1

[–] ronnyCPI [S] 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

I call bullshit on you MF, shill. Remember this: WAGTGYMF.

0
0

[–] KansasJakeBG 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

It's still in deleted posts. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1547234 But I wasn't able to find the the mode deletion post with reason. FULL of amazing info. This post is going to get deleted too so...

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] KansasJakeBG 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Load the whole page and save it as a PDF. A lot of useful info is in the comments and we can't search in the comments.

0
0

[–] carmencita 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Probably the renegade mod that has been on a deleting warpath.