Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] quantokitty 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago (edited ago)
Yes, it's so "statusy" to see how many children you can get to a party. Those of the kind of stats that flamboyant lobbyists schmooze about in the hallowed halls. "You only got a measly 12 kids? At out suckling pig party, we got over 32 underage attendees -- most of them still in diapers!!!! Yup, I can see your point that it would be quite a coup. Especially with all the drinking going on. One thing adult lobbyists/lawmakers like is children underfoot so they can trip over them when they're guzzling beer. Status signalling at its finest!! These are the kind of debunking attempts that make everyone convinced there's something going on besides roasting a pig.
[–] PieInTheEye ago
You are a complete tool. A very blunt one. I'm not 'debunking' anything you troll. I've had it with your noxious retorts to anyone who attempts to bring uncomfortable facts in the way of your assumptions.
Could they have been having a pedoparty? Yes.
Could they have been having a networking exercise in Washington D.C.? More than likely.
Obviously you don't know how Washington works. Lobbyists send their children PURPOSELY to schools where politicians and high level bureaucrats send their children, and then they use their childrens' relationships to cement contacts and deals ... I know ... you just want to view EVERY WIKILEAKS email, uncritically, as a code, and you want to ignore any contextual reasoning what so ever. Why?
Why are you so keen on asphyxiating the attention of forum contributors on one sided interpretations? Is it because you know that NO INVESTIGATION which is not critical of its own methods, can succeed? You don't want any solid success, do you? You just want every contributor to be frothing at the mouth, thrashing about with dead ends and skewed reasoning. Maybe you would be more comfortable as a Social Justice Warrior? Did you choose the wrong team? In the alt-right, I have noticed that there is a greater concern for the truth and for being correct rather than self-deluded, so maybe you should be a little introspective, for the good of the greater community which is searching for the truth? Screw hyperbole, I want the truth. Either you are doing this purposefully, or you are doing it for some psychological reason which provides you with some sick internal raison d'etre.
I think maybe you are simply a fool though, based on how you have reacted to other peoples points of view all over /v/pizzagate. You probably don't even know why you are doing it. As soon as you enter a discussion, you go straight for the first person who has added any constructive criticism to the op. You immediately call them a 'shill', because they don't share your rabid appetite for salacious hype. You are frothing at the mouth to submit peoples opinions into conformity with your own, just like an SJW. Downvoat me all you want, I don't give a shite.
Obviously the Liberal Establishment (as well as the RINO's) in D.C., are packed full of pedophiles and creeps, but nobody is going to find anything solid unless they start even allowing constructive criticism, or at least cultural context, to be a part of their discussions. Grow up!