Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] The_Periodic_Fable [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I intend to keep searching the Wikileaks emails with food related search terms. If you think about it, food is the perfect subject to serve as a cover code for pedophilia (or maybe even crime in general). Perhaps something more will come up. I'd like to do an analysis of how often certain food terms appear in the Wikileaks as opposed to in a similar sized database of work related emails. But I would not know how to get the proper second data set to compare with wikileaks.
[–] oneslyfox 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
I like this idea of putting the data through some comparative analysis, but ideally the control set would be a close to identical work environment - gonna do some searching, this could be super interesting and even useful for codifying certain terms for this perverse community (not ours <3, the creeps we're investigating lol).
[–] The_Periodic_Fable [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
yes! A meta syntax analysis of the wikileaks emails could reveal a lot. Comparing the relative frequency of certain words and phrases to their occurrence in the English language in general. The first data point needed would be the total word count for the entire Wikileaks email set. Then do like this: the word "barbecue" appears once every 1,000,000 words in a wide sampling of English language emails, books, articles, etc. But the same word appears as 1 in 10,000 in the wikileaks emails. (just making up the numbers here)