You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
0

[–] thestormking 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

I'm already aware of this however we're not talking about predictions, we're talking about historical records of weather conditions in zip code 20009 collected by the National Climatic Data Center posted by Farmers' Almanac. Third party sources agree. If we check the temperatures for those days we see similar results expressed in Celsius.

December 5th 2014 Weather Conditions for zip 20009

https://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/KDCA/2014/12/5/DailyHistory.html?req_city=Washington&req_state=DC&req_statename=District+of+Columbia&reqdb.zip=20009&reqdb.magic=1&reqdb.wmo=99999

December 28th 2014 Weather Conditions for zip 20009

https://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/KDCA/2014/12/28/DailyHistory.html?req_city=Washington&req_state=DC&req_statename=District+of+Columbia&reqdb.zip=20009&reqdb.magic=1&reqdb.wmo=99999

Weather conditions were fairly mild for December and only got more so as the month went on. That's not to say that the emails aren't suspicious or couldn't be incriminating but if you base your theories upon conjecture and bad evidence then don't expect reasonable people to believe you. Theories should be based upon facts and not the other way around. If there is something to this email then your couching evidence in a bad theory isn't going to expose it.