Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] birds_sing 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
There are 2 major points, and people only talk about one of them.
The one everyone talks about is that the Democratic party was trying to sabotage one of their candidates and prevent them from getting the nomination - Bernie. The information that this was true was given to the public and may have influenced voters. This is what people talk about.
What no one is talking about is that the Republican party was trying to do the same thing. They were also trying to sabotage one of their candidates and prevent them from getting the Republican nomination - Trump. The fact that the Republican party was trying to prevent Trump from getting the nomination was given to the public, and may have influenced voters.
If it was soooo horrible for everyone to know that Bernie was being sabotaged, then it has to be equally horrible that Trump was.
Or he's going to announce that it was a disgruntled Bernie supporter who worked for the DNC that was the "hacker" who released the info to the public.
[–] Vindicator 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The difference is, everyone knew the Republicans were doing it. Conservatives have been fed up with their bullshit since...oh...Bush was president. Hence the Tea Party movement. I think most were surprised the GOP teamed up with Trump as quickly as it did - and forced cucks like Paul Ryan to fall in line. Republican voters laughed their party's two preferred choices right off the ticket. So no, it was not a horrible revelation.