0
7

[–] nathanwblair 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

i think they're trying to filter out the many shills who mass downvoat & spam propoganda

4
-1

[–] DeathToMasons 4 points -1 points (+3|-4) ago 

That is a lame excuse for halting membership growth.

0
0

[–] cbradioPrepper 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Its BULLiES LIKE THIS loser that are pushing ones out who care with his sick crew that has no life but to obsess and think innocent citizens even knew who some AMELEK CHARACTER IS...beware..of this control freak SHILL PART OF THE FRAUD BULLY CREW OF PSYCHO DELUSIONS..that INVADE UR apace and think your some CHARACTER CALLED ALETAK OR whoever phuck that is..Noone cares of ur delusions..leave us out of ur dramas..

UR the crew pushing CITIZENS OUT..SCRUB.

U DONT OWN PUBLIC ISSUE OF CHILD RTS..keep all ur bout points subverses, who cares, more to life than pusdydramas going around like psychos FRAUD ACCUSE LIBEL ATTACK INNOCENTS..

0
6

[–] SlackeryTurnBull 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Has Pizzagate been confined to the Ghetto?

0
0

[–] fetuspizza 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I think they're treating it more of a gated community. Keep out the shills/undesirables/trolls.

1
-1

[–] VieBleu 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Gated community is just another term for ghetto.

0
0

[–] VieBleu 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

well put.

0
4

[–] Azagthoth 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I have been periodically browsing voat from october till now. This new protocol stems from the need to stave-off the heavy amount of upvote/downvote bots that were hitting the gate threads up really hard. Maybe this will be turned off once they get a handle on the whos who? Lots of shills upvoating total garbage for a while there

0
3

[–] lawfag123 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

It's great that it's invite only. But how do we invite people?

3
-2

[–] DeathToMasons 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

It's "great"? Who are these lemmings? It is not "great", it suggest that they are halting participation and halting membership. It is the same as the government censoring in order to "protect" us. You have either failed or you are a shill yourself.

0
3

[–] lawfag123 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

No I'm not. People who cared the most and were aware of voat got on board. Then the shills noticeably started affecting the board. Then the membership was locked. Seems linear to me - what am I missing?

By locking the membership, the most active/caring/aware members are allowed to continue the investigation without further flood of shills.

0
1

[–] fetuspizza 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

There are too many trolls/shills. This is a good way to keep the spam out. Invite only just means you'll have to prove you're not a bot, and can contribute. I'm for it. They're not banning the researchers. There have been no mass-downvotes lately.

2
1

[–] witch_doctor1 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

This concerns me...how is the forum supposed to grow at an invite only pace? We are on a time schedule....My gut tells me that we are going to see more document dumps/truth bombs as Jan. 20 approaches and we need all hands on deck.

Is there a growing and vibrant invite-only forum anywhere on the 'net?

2
1

[–] flyingcuttlefish 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

that looks scary. I signed up at voat after the Reddit pizzagate ban (recent) and had no trouble.

0
0

[–] VieBleu 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

So I asked for some clarification on the mods' sub - anyone who is a member of voat could do the same - you can view it and comment (but not upvote it) here https://voat.co/v/pizzagatemods/1520291#submissionTop

load more comments ▼ (11 remaining)