Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] YingYangMom 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
The Dutroux case was exposing the pedophile ring all the way up to the Royal family. The argument that prosecuting such people would mean the destruction of their government, hierarchic dynasty and national history was what kept the authorities from pursuing the leads and focusing solely on Marc Dutroux. It is a shame. A real shame. They're getting away with it and it's disgusting.
[–] adam_danischewski [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The Pentagon was also implicated with pedophilia/child pornography ties emerging throughout the US Department of Defense. The investigations were initially stopped, citing "National Security" - something the Obama administration has done to thwart investigations a staggering 8,496 times. That is absurd, especially when you consider how easy it is to draw a line through a "national security" argument and the lax interpretation of the law. According to recent reports the Defense Department investigations may be reopened, hopefully Trump won't thwart future investigations the way Obama has during his administration.
http://livingresistance.com/2016/12/08/200-pentagon-employees-caught-child-pornography/
http://www.forbes.com/sites/85broads/2012/09/19/to-catch-government-workers-with-ties-to-child-porn-call-the-irs/#1482ce6e7b9d
http://www.forbes.com/sites/othercomments/2014/04/16/obama-administration-cites-national-security-to-deny-freedom-of-information-requests-a-record-8496-times/#10074c4c6fd2
[–] Alex_A97 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
All of the current royal families are guilty of crimes against humanity such as this. I hope that one day they will all be put to justice for what they have done.
Being as I've never seen it mentioned here before, look into the Kamloops genocide sometime on Google. In the mid 1960s, Queen Elizabeth II and the-then Pope, Paul VI paid many unannounced visits to Canadian schools and went on 'field-trips' with the aboriginal children. As much as it disheartens me to say this, for many of these children it was the last time they were ever seen. Very few survivors remain, and to my knowledge none of them have told their story. A couple years back it reached a courtroom, but about a week before proceedings were to start the survivor who put forward the accusations suddenly died. Take note that this was sometime circa 2014, long before Pizzagate was even in its fetal stages.
[–] adam_danischewski [S] ago
Interesting, it's as if the Queens were battling. ;-)
I've found the data:
http://itccs.org/2011/02/28/star-eyewitness-who-named-queen-of-england-in-abduction-of-aboriginal-children-dies-suddenly-in-vancouver-hospital/
[–] remedy4reality 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
People were taken by surprise when Queen Beatrix abdicated her thrown, but after 33 years on the thrown and a scandal of murder/pedo/toruture brewing, it all makes sense.
[–] Ctrl-Left 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The same thing happened with Joseph Ratzinger resigning as pope, on the same year, and he was also accused of being part of it. Holy shit.
[–] Sentastixc 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Als pizzagate gaat breken in januari of februari met een officieel FBI onderzoek is dit+demmink doofpot + dutroux X dossiers waar je de verkiezingen in maart mee kunt winnen.
[–] tired_father 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Google translated from Dutch: "If pizza gate will break in January or February with an official FBI investigation that has covered up + + Demmink dutroux X files where you can win with the March elections"
[–] nathanwblair ago (edited ago)
sorry @Sentastixc we only speak english over here & google translate isn't helping much - english please?
[–] Devious1 ago
Hi, where did this article disappear to Has it been slid out of site..???