Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] nnfx ago
Oh no please not again...
Yes I can hear "The voice" and I can also hear, that this is no natural voice, but a voice altered by a pitch shifting effect.
(It's a voice being pitched down to a lower frequency). This is the first thing everybody should be able to realise in the first moments when seeing one of those videos.
But no, some people hear a deep voice which sounds gay so it MUST be a gay man behind that voice right?
Wrong. Even children sound like gay men when theire voices get pitched down. see here "P-I-Z-Z-A"......gay? no! If you want even better results take any audio clip of a woman talking kinda lascivious, pitch it down till it matches male voice tone and it will sound gay as shit.
But ok, that is just theorie. If you want actual proof that this is what we see happening on Majestic Ape we would need something like actual audio- proof of her real voice or something while she is fully dressed up as Ape... Oh wait, we have got exactly this. For example here
This is one of the videos at CPP on which people claim "THIS IS A MAN", but when I put on my headphones and listen carefully, first I notice, like said before, an altered strange deep male voice, but the next thing I notice is there is also "another" voice present at all times and I notice, that it sounds much like a natural female voice. Go for example to 2.00 min and locate the word "special" replay this word few times. Do you hear it? Do you hear the high female voicespectrum kinda echoing in the room over the deep weird altered voice? I do. Just listen and you will hear this in several occasions alone in this video but also in any other video, where she was recorded live.
So what exactly is happening is, that this IS a woman who uses a hardware or software voicemodulation tool EXACTLY LIKE HERE and we can say this is true, because we have videofootage which didn't just capture the processed voice that comes from the speakers, but also her actual voice that comes straight from her mouth.
You know, the person recording this stands only few foot away of her... so no matter who is behind that mask and altered voice, we totally should be able to catch his or her real voice on a device when standing so close.. And it hapened as seen in this video and it presents us a naturel female voice. There is no room for speculation so I can't take anyone serious who pushes those allegations without realising all of this.