Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Infopractical 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Thank you for this information and taking the time to reply.
Okay, then, if the NCMEC is an advertising group for missing children, then here is a composite thought to the big picture: it seems that maybe nonprofits around the world have been providing the Clinton Foundation with data. For instance, there was a Wikileaks email from 2009 describing the specific conditions regarding child trafficking in Haiti, which might as well be intelligence if your doing something like what George Webb suggests and creating brothels for miners or even just shipping kids without ID cards out to other countries.
So, could the NCMEC be a vehicle for data for pedophile networks? And could this be the real reason VA might have been coaxed into encouraging its officers to start following through with the reporting?
It makes a sick kind of sense. If there are pedophile "child hunters" (Buck's Hunting...) who scope out train stations and other kinds of places where children might find refuge and travel having not formed a good plan for where to go next, does this give them...photo ID of the kids?
I know one adult who ran away from home and was scooped up by a predator in California when she was 14. What she has told me about her ordeal sounds a lot like pizzagate experiences, including his acting like a handler with brainwashing by trauma. She told me that her handler scooped her up at a train or bus station.
@cantsleepawink
[–] cantsleepawink [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Yes, in terms of the NCMEC, I have come to this conclusion as well and written about that elsewhere on this board. Briefly, Innocents at Risk is a Washington based non profit, Izette Folger who works there, is a great friend of James Alefantis and her comments can be seen on his inappropriate Instagram postings. This organisation trains airline crew NOT to interfere or intervene with passengers they suspect of trafficking children. Instead they are directed to a trafficking hotline, which then passes it on to Polaris which works with the Clinton Foundation. Can you believe this ?
[–] Infopractical ago
@cantsleepawink , can you link me to where you wrote this on voat? I am keeping my own information set and this adds to a specific thread of my research. Hopefully it will either help me see the bigger picture more clearly or be a conduit to a further lead.
[–] GhostshipResearch ago (edited ago)
The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) is not an advertising group for missing children, they are an advertising group for law enforcement agencies to submit ads of missing children.
They are not a public database of missing children. Law enforcement agencies do not, and cannot, report missing children information to them.
The NCMEC website is no different from their milk carton advertisements. So are pedphiles buying up all the cartons of milk too?
The NCMEC helps find missing kids, and helps catch child pornographers and sex traffickers. Before you attempt to state anything different, you damn well better post from proof.
[–] Infopractical ago (edited ago)
"The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) is not an advertising group for missing children, they are an advertising group for law enforcement agencies to submit ads of missing children."
This is what is known as a "prior", which is an assumption underlying a belief system. Unless you run this agency, you don't know its intentions just like you don't know any other human's intentions.
I'm not stating that I know their intentions. I'm stating a hypothesis for the purpose of testing that hypothesis with other information to determine its consistency. This is an ordinary and reasonable thought experiment.
"you damn well better post from proof."
Um, no. Experiments aren't about proof. Experiments are about establishing consistency between hypotheses and observations.
That said, I know a lot more about this than I'm being up front about for a variety of reasons that I don't care to share with you. If I shared it straight out, it wouldn't be as valuable and convincing than if I walked people through thought experiments and allowed discussion of judgment of the details.