You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

4
-4

[–] MoonWalker68 4 points -4 points (+0|-4) ago 

I respect Mark Passio but there's a good few things I think he's naive on - such as anarchism. I think power will always fill a vacuum and he really laments 'order followers' (as do I, people who blindly follow orders without question) but he seems to extend this to the concept of a nation, police, government and military generally...

On the topics of morality and natural law / the occult, Mark is a great listen however. I'll check it later.

0
1

[–] TheUltimateDebate [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Yeah, I agree on what you say. I'm also seeing too many holes in his anarchistic utopian visions, and frankly, I dont think anyone should have to be that fatalistic in his thought patterns. It's like he thinks that the world only can be fixed in ONE single way, black or white. He doesn't seem to understand that a 1000 roads actually led to Rome.

0
0

[–] MoonWalker68 ago  (edited ago)

Wow this place seems to be full of people who can't handle differing opinions. Every time I give a constructive criticism of one of these famous speakers I get down voted into oblivion. I'm quite a committed PG researcher who wants to help down vote genuine shills, but it seems like a lot of sad people have gained a lot of CP and are abusing it to shit on everyone they disagree with? What's going on here? How about write a comment or response rather than mash your dislike buttons?

Is it possible for some ass holes to stalk your posts and down vote everything you say? Because it feels like that is happening to me..