Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] tamaman 1 point 5 points 6 points (+6|-1) ago (edited ago)
this is completely non factual and not relevant at all... there is nothing to back up her assomptions besides us already being aware that he's a creep.
[–] 1754llp0l171c4l 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I agree.
[–] JJ008 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
This is the dumbest video. I had to stop after she said his mouth keeps opening, like she expects him to talk with his mouth closed. This is the type of video that makes this group look like a bunch of conspiracy theorist.
[–] LawofTruth 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I've never bought into body language, but watching this sick fuck on camera I'm totally sold that he's a pedorass.
[–] glassgauntlet 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The only really relevant part is where she speculates he might have been a victim of some form of abuse.
[–] jbooba [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
That´s what i thought, by the look of it the "Elites" are playing with their children for generations. But ofc that´s pure speculation.
[–] lollipolli ago
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1721634713575&id=1019521281 speaking of body language, Joe biden's is disgusting...yes, I know not 'evidence' but eye opening just the same (at least for me). I had no idea....
[–] Infopractical ago
This may not be hard science, but Podesta seems like an easy target for this kind of analysis. While this may be hard to add to the top line proof summary, I am more convinced now than I had been that Podesta is an evil tool and such a life has manifested itself in observable behaviors.
[–] quantokitty ago
I do believe in the science of body language, but like anything else, there are "expert" experts and not-so-expert ones. I am skeptical of any "expert" analyzing someone when that someone has already been caught in bizarre behavior. If someone were really an expert, they would take a clip of someone who isn't suspected of anything and be able to say with certainty that they're a child molester, or liar, or embezzling, or cheating on their wife. So while I'd love to pile onto JP for reasons that are obvious, I won't here. But I like that the OP posted it as I did some analysis of my own ... like what prompted fast blinking in certain segments, and other known forms of deception.