You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] SheSaidDestroy [S] ago 

I disagree. The photo on the left page is clearly a fully grown woman to me. The photo on the second page might be an older teenager at the youngest. Unless you mean that the book was identified and all the pages were looked at. Is that the case? Without knowing the name of the book, I am unable to search for it if it has been mentioned here, sorry.

0
0

[–] Orange_Circle ago 

There you go: teenager. He's picked the book and opened it to those pages. That's on him for positioning it to appear in what he knew would be a widely viewed photo.

0
0

[–] SheSaidDestroy [S] ago 

Alright, I'll concede to an extent. At a glance I thought it looked like a 17-19 year old at youngest, so I thought it was a dig at him being gay. With my nose practically to my monitor trying to look closer, I guess it could be 15-16 range.