You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
0

[–] thicktail1730947 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Taking this bottom to top: The "NSA" Tweet in the bottom right was bunk, it never happened. The studies quoted are junk and they post-date by several years the .pps files in question. The examples of suspicious internals via opening with 7zip are an apples to oranges comparison (.pps and .ppsx are different formats which look different when opened as archives by 7zip). The image on the the middle right that's partially censored as "graphic content" is just a sicko playing a prank with censor bars - I think. You cannot steganographically encode gigabytes of files in a few megabytes of image. The sheet of hex code in the image is too small to parse and attached to no explanation; it's just there for the hacker look. The whole first section of the "info"graphic is dense nothing just there for the look - Biden makes steganography legal? Thomas Jefferson quotes? Who cares? And they misspelled classified!

In unrelated news that I discovered while wasting my time on this, the author of the suspicious powerpoint files used a cracked Portuguese copy of Powerpoint to make them.