Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] thicktail1730947 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
Taking this bottom to top: The "NSA" Tweet in the bottom right was bunk, it never happened. The studies quoted are junk and they post-date by several years the .pps files in question. The examples of suspicious internals via opening with 7zip are an apples to oranges comparison (.pps and .ppsx are different formats which look different when opened as archives by 7zip). The image on the the middle right that's partially censored as "graphic content" is just a sicko playing a prank with censor bars - I think. You cannot steganographically encode gigabytes of files in a few megabytes of image. The sheet of hex code in the image is too small to parse and attached to no explanation; it's just there for the hacker look. The whole first section of the "info"graphic is dense nothing just there for the look - Biden makes steganography legal? Thomas Jefferson quotes? Who cares? And they misspelled classified!
In unrelated news that I discovered while wasting my time on this, the author of the suspicious powerpoint files used a cracked Portuguese copy of Powerpoint to make them.