Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] pgthrowaway 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
But why is this disturbing? I feel like throwing accusations like that discredits the investigation. It could possibly be a coincidence, I wasn't aware of those symbols before pizzagate. Maybe they weren't either. Of course you can argue that they should change it in light of Pizzagate, but if they did then they would have a legion of investigators accusing them of being pedos in the first place. Alternatively, you could say hey, maybe be aware of this or dig into Unilever for leads, instead of saying "This is disturbing" or implying that Unilever sports a pedo symbol. Please be aware of things like this.
[–] carmencita ago
Also please be aware that we did not think anything of it before because many of us were not aware of the FBI report on the logos and pedo signs. We find it disturbing because of what is connected to those signs. You also should know by now that the elite have been slapped on the hand and also ignored for decades even though many were aware of signs to their being guilty. So those investigators were either suicided or no one printed the evidence. We are experiencing the same right now.
[–] SilenceDoGood [S] ago
I'm not implying anything. I simply presented the facts and if anyone wishes to look more into it, they may do so. What is disturbing to me is after all the time I spent looking at pizzagate, the symbology shows up in my class slides for international business no less. I'm not calling them child traffickers but looking into them seems more than appropriate.
[–] pgthrowaway ago
Right, which is what should be done, but I'm letting you know that the title is click baitey and don't convey the message you're trying to send. Rather, it reads as if Unilever's logo is disturbing.
[–] francine_rose ago
Even if it seems "coincidental" somebody who designs these knows symbology, understands color theory, etc
Also you get your art submitted for copywrite
[–] CuckSlap ago
That definitely looks like the "childlove" logo. Good find.
[–] apparatchik1488 ago
this company made it http://www.carterwongdesign.com/
[–] apparatchik1488 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Hey, good find man.