RE: Farmers L Update and Welcome Mat
OK so this is the email (one of 3, but they seem to be titled the same) that discusses inviting children to some sort of event and discusses heating a pool.
Now I have very recently jumped on board Pizzagate and believe a lot of this needs serious investigation and to be taken more seriously by people dismissing it as fake news, but we also need to be critical of some of these individual emails and try to investigate the names mentioned in them a little more thoroughly for two reasons:
-
We could find more evidence
-
We might find out it wasn't what we thought it was. And I do say might because possibility 1 is also still a possibility
We need to search the Podesta emails and the other email categories that might be relevant for the names in this email to see if there might be a context for this.
With enormous gratitude to Advance Man Extraordinaire Haber, I am popping up again to share our excitement about the Reprise of Our Gang’s visit to the farm in Lovettsville. And I thought I’d share a couple more notes: We plan to heat the pool, so a swim is a possibility. Bonnie will be Uber Service to transport Ruby, Emerson, and Maeve Luzzatto (11, 9, and almost 7) so you’ll have some further entertainment, and they will be in that pool for sure. And with the forecast showing prospects of some sun, and a cooler temp of lower 60s, I suggest you bring sweaters of whatever attire will enable us to use our outdoor table with a pergola overhead so we dine al fresco (and ideally not al-CHILLo). I am ccing Trudy to repeat the invite, and sending pining wishes-you-could-come to Rima, John P, and Laurie & Chris.
What is weird about this is of course the possible mentioning of the young children "Ruby, Emerson, and Maeve Luzzatto (11, 9, and almost 7)"
Some investigation reveals that Luzzatto is of course a recurring name in the Podesta emails. Specifically a Tamara Luzzatto.
According to Politico (cringe) this is Tamara. Here is a web.archive org link. I believe the HRC camp has misspelled her name repeatedly, but "Tamera Luzzatto" appears in the send to lines of the Pool email.
She is also a "leader" of Pew Charitable Trusts. This can potentially lead to more evidence of corruption between charities and the Clinton Campaign.
Her linkedin is here. It says she went to The Brearly School in 1969. So she is fairly old.
Now let's back up a bit and look at the children mentioned: "Ruby, Emerson, and Maeve Luzzatto (11, 9, and almost 7)"
They are also Luzzattos based on this and are likely related to her. If those numbers are their ages then they are likely her own grandchildren. I do not believe the children mentioned in this email were in any danger/pedophilic context. It looks like some family and friends get-together. For those of you wanting more leads I have already mentioned a ton of businesses Tamera/Tamara has worked for and she is definitely a likely suspect on her own.
EDIT2: OK so in order to prove that this email isn't what we thought we- I daresay- need to find out more about her family to see whether or not these kids are related to her or if she is trying to pass them off as related to her. All I could find are these business websites on her, but there's got to be a mention somewhere of this influential person at least having a family at all. Yes claiming they are Lazzatos could be a lie, but we need to prove that.
This email does not look like a good lead to me anymore and we should be hesitant to use it as proof of Pizzagate. The email that mentions Tamera's relatives makes way more sense than all the other ones. We should keep it about the CP codewords used over and over in other emails. The other emails have a lot less obvious context to them and a lot more obvious doublespeak and code. We need to keep things tighter and try to not accidentally spread our weaker points, because they make it easier for MSM to actually find something weak to point at. So far their publicity has been really good for Pizzagate but that is because they don't have anything to debunk currently.
EDIT: OK so I had a thought after submitting this that makes me question this again though. We should still be a little skeptical but yes of course the email is still on the table for meaning something.
It just might not mean what we originally thought.
I'll keep examining it and update what I get out of it.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] quantokitty 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Yup, another shill who professes "Now I have very recently jumped on board Pizzagate", and then goes on to spew ridiculous disinformation.
I'm really getting sick of this, but enjoy spending your Soros money.
[–] hawkwardd ago
Agreed. This is exactly what we should be looking more into.
[–] Skalding [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
Yeah I understand you guys' harsh defensiveness and all but breath a little and think on this. I am actively editing it and admitting my assumption could be wrong, and I am not making a full on claim. We just need to keep our minds keen and be careful what we do share.
And the "jumped on board thing": Yeah I've been right-wing as long as I've given a crap, but I've never put stock in the constant conspiracies around democrats. The Right always has the same list of bogeymen over and over every election cycle and it wasn't until Wikileaks proved Soros and Clinton really were corrupt before I started to take it serious.
Everyone is working on memes to spread on social media and that's an excellent idea but we want to be sure we use the best we can.
We also need to prove these kids aren't hers somehow to make this email meet our original argument on it, or find a new context for it.
[–] trillmore_trout 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
No, the email is strange in any context, your "skepticism" is thinly veiled disinformation and you should be ashamed of yourself if you couldn't immediately see how odd the language in the email is. Piece by piece an odd piece of evidence may not hold water but when you add it all up you see how many weird pedoesque instances there are in the emails and social media.
[–] quantokitty 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
"We"?!!! You're using the word "WE" like you're a actually trying to uncover the truth when you post sh*t that could have been written by a two-year-old?
Come on! Step up to the plate and admit you're a shill. And if you think I'm going to waste my time arguing talking points of why you're a jerk and why this ridiculous disinformation is laughable, you're more out of your mind than I imagine you to be.
Soros is getting desperate. .