Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] SIMONBARROW 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago (edited ago)
If Podesta is around, why is the DC press not interviewing him? He's at the centre of the two biggest scandals in the world right now (Podesta emailgate, Pizzagate). If I were a newspaper editor, I would have my reporters staked outside his house.
[–] Jem777 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
WARNING: I posted about this yesterday Devi Nunes wrote HR6393 with intentional language that gives the government the power to shut down what they consider "fake news" using the excuse of Russian propaganda. If John Podesta is in his office I am sure he had a hand in this and he might also have blackmail stuff on Nunes we need to make this viral. The bill is in the senate now if passed Obama will sign it into law then we all can be shut down.
[–] UncookedSpirit 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Another poster theorizes this will be used against us. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1462287
[–] QuestionEverything 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
HR6393 is pure evil. Going to be interesting seeing them try to use. Because there's some serious Unconstitutional stuff in there. -LIke foregoing the need for a warrant in some cases, and WORSE: the broad purview that VPN or TOR uses are automatically criminals in their eyes.
They have viral injector sw too: so now all they have to do is pick victims.
Plant Incriminating evidence -> pretend suspicion -> conduct 'investigation' -> find 'evidence' -> arrest.
/Repeat ad infinitum
[–] Prepper_Jack 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Check section 501 of the bill:
Now, consider the following list of organizations from this "highly trusted" organization the Washington Post touts (who nobody knows, has ever heard of, or apparently knows any members of).
http://www.propornot.com/p/the-list.html
Yep, they're labeling alternative media as Russian spies. Bye Drudge. Bye Infowars. Bye Corbett Report. Bye all the YouTube channels you love. Hope they survive well in prison for being "Russian spies".
[–] mishka ago
HR 6393 is not that controversial, and it's been worked on for months. https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/2596
They also have to approve one every year or there will be a government shutdown of the NSA, CIA, etc.
[–] pizzagatewillnotdie 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
"or there will be a government shutdown of the NSA, CIA, etc."
One can only dream.
[–] VieBleu 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
somehow, I don't think they'd shut down.
[–] Prepper_Jack ago (edited ago)
Check section 501 of the bill. It's basically a resurrection of the UAC (Un-American Activities Committee), but against suspected "Russian" media firms. Now, consider this list that Washington Post described as those who have been identified as suspected Russian media firms:
http://www.propornot.com/p/the-list.html
Any idea who these people are? Are they a credible organization? Or is it some folks who don't like that we're figuring out what's going on?
Under such a committee, they would declare the ability to shut down these news services. Drudge Report. Infowars. RT. It's the entirety of alternative media. Everything but news outlets that favor the Democratic party, and Fox News.
This is extraordinarily controversial.
[–] mishka ago
They have no such authority. All HUAC did was call people to testify. HUAC had no significant authority either, they did politely ask Hollywood executives to fire people, but that's pretty much it.
[–] SIMONBARROW ago
Why are the Republicans going along with it, then?
[–] AaronDover 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
If Podesta were shot dead it would not only serve justice but would also force the MSM to report it in a way they would find it very hard to control. Just saying.