0
89

[–] jurneythrusnd 0 points 89 points (+89|-0) ago 

I just got blocked by the writer of the article on twitter asking him about this. Putting out a video soon exposing them!

0
44

[–] MAGABoomer 0 points 44 points (+44|-0) ago 

Get as many people as you can to tweet the author making a record of it on his/her page. Fire with fire...and really great job catching this!

0
37

[–] Scotty_Doesnt_Kno 0 points 37 points (+37|-0) ago 

I'm blocked now too. Only reason to block instead of answering our questions is if he has something to hide.

0
4

[–] thicktail1730947 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Don't spam "as many people as you can". It'd be far more effective to get a slow drip of people over time. Eventually someone will get an answer. Fight fire with water - flowing and persistent.

0
23

[–] Live_Free_Or_Die 0 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago 

Well, well. That's enough proof for me. This rabbit hole is INFINITE. I am seriously wondering if all this "crazy" shit about a shadow government s real. I cannot believe that the power of child sex has this much power over those with the most power on Earth.

1
26

[–] AnUnconcernedCitizen 1 points 26 points (+27|-1) ago 

I wasn't going to register on Voat, and I wasn't going to say anything, but I could not resist the temptation.

One, this has been going on since literally forever. From Ancient Rome, to the aristocratic libertines of the 18th and 19th centuries, up until now. These people have such microscopic peckers, only extra-tight nine-year-old poontang and little boy assholes will satisfy them. Just ask Marc Dutroux and his cronies.

Two, human trafficking is a business worth $32 billion a year. Criminal thugs don't just pluck little kids from the streets for free, as some kind of hobby. They do it for money, on behalf of the select clientele who can afford to pay enough to offset the substantial personal and legal risk involved in kidnapping. Compare it to other illicit products. I mean, narcotics are a high-volume item, relatively speaking. Joe Sixpack might be able to afford a little meth or crack now and then, but who other than mob bosses, politicians and moneyed elites can afford to buy children? Our children?

Three, you guys will never find a smoking gun. These people are rich, and they're very practiced at this. The second those e-mails leaked, I bet you dollars to donuts that within 48 hours, they had "cleaners" go over their dens of debauchery with bleach and peroxide. There is no evidence. It's gone. Vaporized. Before there was even a controversy about the contents of the e-mails, they were covering their tracks. Nonetheless, there are leads, and there is still some hope that you guys might pick up the trail. They got sloppy, this time.

And people wonder why I don't go out my front door. There are too many goddamned humans outside.

0
12

[–] brokencookie 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

Oh it's real alright. Enjoy your red pill.

0
6

[–] Htaed 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

How can you think a shadow govt is crazy? LOL

0
2

[–] TheGettysburgAddress 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

All snakes.

0
9

[–] Freemasonsrus 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Google's system is run by a bot, I believe. Meaning it archives things as a new edit has occurred or new article is posted. (Someone correct me if I'm wrong) So a cached page for instance doesn't necessarily display the correct time it was originally posted if there has been an update. For instance, it could be posted at 9am, edited at 10am, and therefore the bots records would be the 10am grab.

Here's a theory someone with more knowledge maybe able to dispute or enlighten on. If an article was posted to a site in a password protected area for distribution later, (I write article, save to site to post at a later time), would the article then have a posted time stamp of the original upload into the password protected area or is time stamp associated with time it went "public". My thinking is that they wouldn't be ballsy enough to post it hours ahead of time, but they would prepare it and have it ready to be posted publicly. So the only catch would be the bot catching the original version as the time stamp. Any thoughts?

0
1

[–] AreWeSure 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

yeah, I think you would have to have some knowledge of the web content management system for that site.

And I have heard of this type of thing happening before.

Google search let's you run searches for specific dates, so you can do something like search for person before they hit the news.....otherwise your search results are all recent events. I have noticed that this doesn't also work and you end up with a lot of hits outside the specific dates you entered.

1
1

[–] llm2016 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Excuses. That's my thought.

0
0

[–] RecycledUser 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I posted a YT link from tonight, that a long-timer created, showing how searching on G for CPP, now has the 'NEWS' tab removed. It's there for other searches, but not for that....

0
3

[–] Wellwerefucked 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

So we just proof of a Disinformation false flag?

0
19

[–] DarkMath 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago 

A quick search of google and we find Edgar Maddison Welch isn't your average red neck. He's an actor and is into writing screen plays for low budget movies. Weird, isn't James Alefantis into low budget movies? ;-)

0
5

[–] nchomemaker 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Edgar Maddison Welch Miscellaneous Crew | Actor | Writer Edgar Maddison Welch is known for his work on Mute (2011), The Mill (2008) and A Tale About Bootlegging (2005). From: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2625901/

0
1

[–] r3dtr1x 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

lol @ his IMDB!

0
0

[–] HarveyKlinger 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I don't have an IMDB :(

0
14

[–] Koched_Up404 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

Well done getting those screen grabs! ARCHIVE

0
7

[–] Millennial_Falcon [M] 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Hi jacking to say I think this was debunked in another thread posted by same user. Apparently this is a known Google bug and has to do with the server being in a different time zone.

0
2

[–] justiceforever 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Link to other thread?

0
0

[–] Koched_Up404 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Thanks for the clarification. Cheers

0
11

[–] ThorTheWonderful 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

I just tried them on twitter, I asked how is it "if this happened at 3 PM, how did your story break at 11:00 AM?" They blocked me instantly! This is indeed a false flag event and part of mass media propaganda attack with heavy use of terms like "conspiracy theorists" and "alt-right" "fictitious" etc etc etc..

0
11

[–] KeenAdam 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

What the fuck....? Seems so dystopian seeing something so evil being hidden on such a large scale. I used to think conspiracies and such were only for nut jobs to believe in but this is opening my eyes.

0
8

[–] brokencookie 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Yep. Next stop 911, then Sandy Hook. I wish I were just a nut job. This shit is as real as it gets.

0
3

[–] fartyshorts 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Sandy Hook was probably directly related to pizzagate.

5
-4

0
9

[–] unbiased_researcher 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

I think it must be a glitch in Google news feed. I found the same thing at yahoo's news feed for NBC Washington.

http://sli.mg/rYMN9k

0
2

[–] ChronicMathDebater 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

https://archive.fo/nKKuD

If so, then there must be more than one glitch happening, and not just on Google's end. This is from 00:00:00 UTC on December 4th. I'm assuming some bot went and archived this at midnight, but this is something that needs an explanation.

It is altogether possible that there's an interesting series of glitches happening here, but I'd like someone to explain this.

0
0

[–] Veaux 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I noticed same posting before event time with Ohio stabbing news but didn't screen save.

0
8

[–] SsupGuys 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Saving meta from the article:

<meta property="article:published_time" content="2016-12-04T16:10:18-05:00" />

<meta property="article:modified_time" content="2016-12-04T21:08:26-05:00" />

<meta property="og:updated_time" content="2016-12-04T21:08:26-05:00" />

0
8

[–] SsupGuys 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The server time might not be using Eastern Time...

Edit:

This is odd... when searching for the article on normal search, it still displays the article as 10 hours ago, when you search by news it now shows as 5 hours ago. Did They fix something there? https://sli.mg/a/uC2wUW

Edit2:

I was wrong... I'm sorry for confusing anybody but the time I fetched from the archived page was actually from the archived page itself (dating December 05). The lead was wrong so I'm actually more into thinking this is simply a timezone fuckup on googles side.

0
1

[–] Freemasonsrus 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Thank u! I asked about this up top and this helps explain a bit more.

0
1

[–] go1dfish 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Publish date is likely set in the CMS to determine when the article is to be released.

May be when setting a date/current date that it sets the time to a specific time in the morning.

I think this is more likely than the more conspiratorial explanation.

0
2

[–] SsupGuys 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I'm not entirely sure if washingtonian is using wordpress, but every CMS including wordpress set the publsihed time when you START writing an article or SAVE it the first time. This has nothing to do with the time to actually publish an article, it would be also pretty odd to specify an article to the exact second it's supposed to be published.

Anyway, as written/edited, I think it's just a bug on the side of google since the time on article seems to be around an hour after the incident happened.

0
7

[–] MeatballPizza 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Was Wikipedia updated like this as well? They had the WaPo story added there damn fast...

0
7

[–] nadrewod 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Yeah, the text they added (end of last paragraph for "Services and reputation") even says he "fired one or more shots". This is a complete hoax.

EDIT: Their "cited source" is the hastily-written Washington Post article. No actual police reporters, no actual video or audio of the shots being fired, just one line at the top of the article.

They also gave their own posts 20-200 upvotes to make it look more legitimate.

EDIT 2: According to the edit history, the incident was first edited on at "22:56, December 4th" on Wikipedia's servers, with the most recent update only happening about 90 minutes later at "00:35, December 5th". This was rushed.

0
9

[–] MeatballPizza 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

I'm confused.

The cops said this had "nothing to do with Pizzagate" was the first story.

Now EVERY story is blaming Pizzagate.

??

load more comments ▼ (71 remaining)