You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
7

[–] ArchonFall4All 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

First of all, you act like a complete ass, and your post history makes me think you're not interested in a fair debate. But here's the important part: We've spent the last few weeks assembling our arguments online. James and anybody else involved is free to come online and refute all of the points we've made. We don't need a physical location to debate, especially when the safety of researchers is at stake. The internet is more than sufficient for James to present his side of the story, and the internet isn't as vulnerable to manipulation by any parties with a vested interest in this case.

2
-1

[–] XVktm [S] 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

"the internet isn't as vulnerable to manipulation by any parties with a vested interest in this case" LMFAO. wow. that's some serious naivety on your part. your double standard here with your concern for people's safety is amusing. do you apply that same standard to the people you accuse?

0
4

[–] krisspykriss 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I am sure someone listed as one the 50 most influential people in DC can handle a few "death threats". The man has Capital Police on speed dial. Just because a few crazies take it to threats and intimidation does not mean the movement as a whole is about threats and intimidation. Or shall we chastise and ostracize the DNC because some crazies beat some people up for voting for Trump. How about demonizing the green movement via the uni-bomber?

Lord, you guys project a lot.

0
3

[–] ArchonFall4All 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

James needs to hire a better PR agent. Your attitude is only further tarnishing his image