Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] ArchonFall4All 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
First of all, you act like a complete ass, and your post history makes me think you're not interested in a fair debate. But here's the important part: We've spent the last few weeks assembling our arguments online. James and anybody else involved is free to come online and refute all of the points we've made. We don't need a physical location to debate, especially when the safety of researchers is at stake. The internet is more than sufficient for James to present his side of the story, and the internet isn't as vulnerable to manipulation by any parties with a vested interest in this case.
[–] XVktm [S] 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
"the internet isn't as vulnerable to manipulation by any parties with a vested interest in this case" LMFAO. wow. that's some serious naivety on your part. your double standard here with your concern for people's safety is amusing. do you apply that same standard to the people you accuse?
[–] krisspykriss 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
I am sure someone listed as one the 50 most influential people in DC can handle a few "death threats". The man has Capital Police on speed dial. Just because a few crazies take it to threats and intimidation does not mean the movement as a whole is about threats and intimidation. Or shall we chastise and ostracize the DNC because some crazies beat some people up for voting for Trump. How about demonizing the green movement via the uni-bomber?
Lord, you guys project a lot.
[–] ArchonFall4All 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
James needs to hire a better PR agent. Your attitude is only further tarnishing his image