Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] quantokitty ago
The last thing anybody wants to do is hurt his business.
If this guy could prove the investigation is harming his business, it would legally be possible for him to go after individuals speculating about possible unsavory/illegal sexual activities. It would also means legally shutting down such speculation.
No, no, no!!! Whatever anybody does, do not deliberately impede his business and ability to earn a living.
What he is or isn't should be proven in a court of law.
[–] thicktail1730947 ago
How would hurting the businesses force law enforcement into some kind of action?
[–] dph1978 [S] ago
I guess what I'm saying is, a real tangible event would wake them up to this. If they see a prominent business sinking from demonstrations, from protests, etc in DC -- they would have to take a look at what's going on. Alefantis has halfheartedly asked law enforcement to protect his business against "false accusations", but, he can't really go there for obvious reasons. In my opinion, one strategy to consider is to organize events around Comet and Besta. Take down the front businesses, and see what's exposed from there. Without the cover of Comet, people may talk. Given the exposure, his allies aren't going to be so open and willing to donate $ to him. Unravel the front businesses, and see what comes out.
[–] quantokitty 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
No, this is a terrible idea. Going after somebody's business is terrorism. You don't have a right to do that on suspicion alone.
Absolutely do not do anything illegal and blocking someone from conducting business is illegal as hell. Use the energy to investigate. Find the smoking gun that can't be ignored and proves all the speculation and conjecture true.