You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] insurgentsoul 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Reading through all the Twitter replies and shit, he gives 'confirmation bias' as an answer to fucking everything. Confirmation bias can be thrown around in so many cases. While I understand what he's saying, that doesn't automatically disprove or debunk pizzagate. I'm not sure what he's suggesting, but he's acting as if WE'RE committing a crime by researching and investigating. He seems oddly butthurt. And I agree with many others that the McMartin case is not a compelling comparison. These are two completely different cases. And, like TreyGowdy said, the McMartin case he mentions relies in eye witness testimony-- none of which is involved in pizzagate at all, so far.

I see Scott Adams' point, but he can't just spit the words 'confirmation bias' to try to derail us and make himself feel superior. Sorry, it's going to take a lot more than that.

0
1

[–] pirawrr [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

everything is just an illusion. you've just fallen into his hypnotic jiujitsu. his tweet was a linguistic killshot

/sarcasm

0
1

[–] insurgentsoul 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Confirmation bias confirmed, rekt