Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
[–] [deleted] ago
[–] pirawrr [S] ago
evidence is just an illusion. you found evidence because you looked for it. confirmation bias confirmed!!! hallucination killshot!!! /sarcasm
[–] Millennial_Falcon 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
He's just plain wrong. Confirmation bias regarding individual leads is certainly a trap some investigators have been falling into, but the case as a whole rests on strong evidence. Alefantis commenting "chickenlovers" on a photo of his friend holding his one-year-old son can't reasonably be interpreted in any way other than the widely used pedophile slang. Same with all the references surrounding Heavy Breathing and their videos, and the graffitti in Comet, the instagram posts, the logos, etc. It's just far too much smoke for there not to be a fire.
[–] insurgentsoul 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Reading through all the Twitter replies and shit, he gives 'confirmation bias' as an answer to fucking everything. Confirmation bias can be thrown around in so many cases. While I understand what he's saying, that doesn't automatically disprove or debunk pizzagate. I'm not sure what he's suggesting, but he's acting as if WE'RE committing a crime by researching and investigating. He seems oddly butthurt. And I agree with many others that the McMartin case is not a compelling comparison. These are two completely different cases. And, like TreyGowdy said, the McMartin case he mentions relies in eye witness testimony-- none of which is involved in pizzagate at all, so far.
I see Scott Adams' point, but he can't just spit the words 'confirmation bias' to try to derail us and make himself feel superior. Sorry, it's going to take a lot more than that.
[–] pirawrr [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
everything is just an illusion. you've just fallen into his hypnotic jiujitsu. his tweet was a linguistic killshot
/sarcasm
[–] insurgentsoul 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Confirmation bias confirmed, rekt
[–] sentryseven 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I've heard this guy. He's actually not that smart. He's quite naive about the state of things. For instance he calls Obama one of the greatest presidents of all time. He also said Trump offered zero issues on the campaign trail. If it is confirmation bias, it's only occurring because hundreds of coincidences and connections are occurring over and over and over again. The guy would make for a terrible investigator. He's smoked too much weed.
[–] youhavetogoback123 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Is he running interference. Maybe. Don't judge a book by his cover. This story is too big. If you don't have anything positive to ad to the investigation then don't say anything at all. No idea who this guy is, his background, I don't care. This issue is too big. Keep digging lads. They're paranoid. Alafantis was on NPR the other day on his heels. Don't kid yourselves, these people know they are being watched. Comet PingPong doesn't even answer their phone anymore.
[–] youhavetogoback123 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Wouldn't trust that man as far as I could throw him Look at that face. Looks like Epstein. Go away concern troll, who are you covering for.... You may be one of them for all we know.
[–] MeatballPizza ago
We don't know what happened at this point. We have lots of smoke. Is there fire? We shall see.