Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] AdamSKestle ago (edited ago)
Hey kiddo. let me just say first how great it is to see younger people waking up and investing themselves in staying informed. Keep it up and speak as much of the truth you gauge someone is ready for, because what may or may not be happening has the potential to be the motherload of all redpill's concerning the nature of our leaders and governing bodies. It's the gauging that's the hardest part of sharing with friends and loved ones. Depending on where you live and how invested into the leftist narrative people around you are however, you might just have to accept that nothing short of Hillary clinton or John Podesta literally being walked to the paddywagon in handcuffs on CNN could sway them. These next 1-3 months are potentially going to be the most trying in our nation's recent history, and our next president is facing the greatest litmus test I can ever remember in my lifetime. But there is at least moderate-high probability that the old order's chickens will come home to roost, and you will in fact see at least John Podesta and many key players face those consequences and even the legacy media will be forced to cover it. If someone around you falls more to center and acts dismissive at first, depending what you shared that can be verified there's probably fair probably they'll at least google that to see what they get. For those kinds of people, of which I was one, I think the most important question is what is enough? It's like the email scandals. The left tries to blow it off by saying nothing serious was in the emails. There was, but that's not the point. The point is even if 30,000-650,000 email were literally all about yoga, the existence of the server itself was the crime. The very server was enough to question her character. For me I haven't decided on the absolute guilt of all these parties, but the scandal happening now is at the very least a very drastic questioning of these people's characters. So if your facing an undecided, ask yourself what part of the scandal do you think would make the relate with you in questioning the character of these people and be sure to back up what you say with evidence. There's a lot we definitely know that while it is circumstantial and character driven it's still something objective and observable. For me the first that got me questioning was Tony Podesta's art. That alone made me uncomfortable with the nature of these people's psyches. From there the Kim Noble art that was at Comet ping pong just gets worse, and from there you can definitely prove that's the kind of man that contributes to the clinton campaign, gets invites to the whitehouse, is friends with the Podestas, gets 11,000 donations from a billionaire for no apparent reason etc. Make sure you forward and share exact links if they're open to it. Try not to get too invested and be ready to hear about Trump's Epstein connection (it still has me nervous and is why I see Trump as going through a litmus test). If you're religious pray, and if your spiritual meditate, and don't let your anger be blind. Decide about what parts of this scandal are making you the most suspect and be a realist about what's going on. No matter what this scandal is still a crisis of character for our nation and you can expect pushback because of how difficult realizations like this are to process.