Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 0xFFF ago (edited ago)
You said it in your last sentence, they don't have a clue what they re talking about. That is their weak point. Just give em 1 or two key facts to chew on. Like the torture chamber post. Or ask them what alternative theory they have for meaning of codes used in podesta mails. Like, don't tell them hey look i found out clintons are involved in global child trafficking balblabla.... better show something like the torture chamber post and ask them "hey don't you think this is creepy? I cant explain it to myself but what could this be?" He will strt ask questions
hope i am getting my point across there. what i am trying to say is trigger their interest so they start asking you - do not try to educate them.
If they have been triggered, but try to ignore it.... whenever eg. clintons come up at the dinner table, like "omg have you heard hilly wants a recount" answer something like: "it doesn't really matter - they gonna be in jail soon for raping, murdering and eating babies and children anyway" .... Probably better to keep it a little more vague at some times - they will usually start asking questions soon enough...
[–] IfIDieThenDig ago
"They could have had negotiations and described them as torturous, this took place in the torture room."
"I though he was somewhat known for cooking italian cousine? And when I researched Podesta and his cooking this is what I got.... Are you sure about this?"
"Where are you getting all of this from? Do you have any evidence to these claims? Don't you think you're acting a bit odd?"
"Sure son. Just before the UFO's land on the white house lawn then?" / "What makes you say that? The FBI cleared her, do you think you know better than the EFF BEE AYE?!"
If they have a son/friend smart enough to research this topic, I will also assume they have the mental faculty to dismiss unfounded accusations.
I have yet to see a single piece of information that people are willing to act on or emotionally respond to. The smoking gun has to be a smoking cannon stuck in their faces lest the bullet bounces off the armor of "That's just too outlandish without any evidence."
[–] 0xFFF ago (edited ago)
"They could have had negotiations and described them as torturous, this took place in the torture room."
In what world is it normal to have politicians make negotiations in a cooling chamber, and posting about it under synonym "jimmycomet" on social media, adding the hashtag #murder. commenting himself with "Oh yeah looks like fun" And then have other questionable people (see their posts) commmenting things like: "rinse it off when you're done", "Just a pile of money under a sheet"
"I though he was somewhat known for cooking italian cousine? And when I researched Podesta and his cooking this is what I got.... Are you sure about this?"
Ok then pint out the emails where words like pizza are being used clearly as code. No i am not sure about it just looking for alternative explanation what these codes could mean. shows emails
"Where are you getting all of this from? Do you have any evidence to these claims? Don't you think you're acting a bit odd?"
The internets... its like a big library you know... you can look stuff up and shit.
"Sure son. Just before the UFO's land on the white house lawn then?" / "What makes you say that? The FBI cleared her, do you think you know better than the EFF BEE AYE?!"
You can joke about it all you want. I am sure all the raped, tortured and murdered children appreciate it.