Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] L2_Revolve 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
By that logic, are you against r/stopdrinking?
[–] CJJacobs [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
I'm saying the blind leading the blind usually ends up off a cliff. While there may be exceptions, they are just that...exceptions...and not the rule. I'm not interested in discussing every known dilemma. And why are there so many pedo-apologists here!?
Pedophilia is evil and it is very well known (via scientific research) that barring a miracle (which I do allow for), recidivism is high and it is virtually uncurable though.
[–] L2_Revolve 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
Fair enough. I think the blind leading the blind can work out if one of them have a sense of direction.
I'm not trying to discuss individual cases but to see if your principles can be applied to anything or if you have individual principles for individual cases. Which it seems.
Where have I defended pedophiles? I haven't yet, but I'm going to right here - just to oblige you.
I'm OK with pedophiles in the same way a lot of christians are OK with non-practicing homosexuals.
Pedo- and hebophilia are sexual attractions. Sexual abuse is a criminal act.
I can't really feel anger towards a celibate pedophile and recidivism... How can you demand that someone who did nothing stop abusing?
People who sexually abuse the weakest in society on the basis of sexual desire have shown that they're not able to control their urges, and in light of this being a mental illness (which I've understood we can't really "cure") then indefinite confinement or deactivation of the sexual hormonal system is in order.
Lock up or castrate child abusers. That pedo-apologetic enough for you?
[–] justforthissubverse ago
False equivalency. The sub is not called r/stoppeding It is r/pedofriends I have unfortunately seen some of the conversations there and they were not about "how do I stop this"
That being said - shitposting on that sub does not seem like a good tactic regardless