You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] thicktail1730947 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I clicked into the website. It looks... unimpressive. If I didn't already agree with the POV it's pushing, these articles wouldn't persuade me. It's sad that this domain isn't in the hands of someone making a better case, and it'd be sadder still if the authors were actually predators.

That old guy whose case you highlighted probably is harmless. If the writer told no lies about his condition, he's psychologically and physiologically incapable of predation due to his failing brain and body. AFAIK his wife is also right about the residency requirements applying only to voluntary residence. Most importantly, he's not a convicted pedophile. He's a convicted gynecologist. There's little reason to suspect that arguing his case in particular covers for pedophiles.

About the logo, I think this blog is being innocently stupid, not criminally disingenuous.

0
1

[–] Phobos_Mothership [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Thanks for your opinion, 6 day old account with no contributions.

0
1

[–] veritas_vincit 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Says 5 day old account. XD

0
1

[–] thicktail1730947 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Thanks for contributing a link that I hadn't seen, paranoiac. <3

I do appreciate the work, even if you're lying about my contributions. I contribute in comments rather than submissions unless I consider something vital and well-evidenced. It isn't a bar I hit very quickly. I only made a handful of submissions on the reddit forum I came from during an exodus that many came from it (your grasp of recent forum history fails you if you think being exactly six days old makes someone look bad here). It was at least refreshing to have the off-topic distraction come in the form of fresh content this time. Fresh content is where new leads come up. Keep investigating. If I'm wrong about this site, I want to know that, too.