Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] Womb_Raider 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Lol. They don't want Assange in the spotlight. Screw them, lets all keep Assange at the top.
[–] RebelSkum 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Pure MSM trolling. Let me guess, Julian Assange was in the lead. Boo, fucking, hoo. He's now even MORE in the lead!
[–] Yuser_Manuel 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Yeah, he was winning then they shut it down.
[–] EndThePizza 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
It's all a joke anyway. They only "consider the input of their readers" when they make the decision themselves.
[–] 6948543? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Now Putin has 51%... I'm sure this will warrant a fist shake towards the sky with a cry of "Those Damned Russian hackers!" by the entirety of the MSM.
[–] TrumpSucksCock 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The won't let Assange win. It's a set up. Putin is in the lead.
[–] MAGABoomer 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
What bunk. Assange at 4%.
[–] Fuzzycrumpkin ago
I think assange or Trump should get it. Even if it is Putin i might be OK with that. Assange the most though.
[–] teethkicker ago
What does this have to do with the investigation?
[–] derram ago
https://archive.is/9nnBO :
https://archive.is/SiSZ5 :
This has been an automated message.
[–] 6948394? ago
Putin is fuckin' rocking it now...