Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] wannabe101 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
sure of itself a pic of writing on a persons hands, even WITH the shit eating grin would be seen as indicating nothing but, when you throw alllll these other images, connections, odd sentence contexts etc. its not just a single pic of a guy wth writing on his hands, and shouldn't be judged as such
[–] ManWithTheUmbrella 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I'll talk all day and night about the art in his office and in his home. We can even take note of his odd looking bruised hands. But the number and the fish, if tied to something real then we should all just not get distracted. If you have a narrative then your brain will find connections that aren't even necessarily there to make all evidence fall in line with said narrative, however, without anything concrete then redefining the meaning of something like this can be done with anything and therefore may the most creative shoe horning individual's story win the day. This subject is serious, if we all start resembling those youtubers who find 666 in every fuckn logo ever then it all just becomes some watered down foil hat nonsense.