You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] Prepper_Jack 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Ahh yes, speculation is absolutely pointless when investigating. Of course.

If anything is out of place here, and seems to be "discrediting" things it's you. I also note that you don't seem to have contributed to the "effort" at all.

0
0

[–] ManWithTheUmbrella ago 

Well I made this account today, and have only spent 48 hours looking at all the evidence and to be honest with you, all the interesting stuff seems to be being recycled over and over again, and I thought this particular post did a good job at debunking this image which appears in almost all media of pizzagate. I am not just going to throw shit at a wall and hope it sticks. If critical thinking lacks in this community then I guess that my questioning is needed. Your comment seemed more like disinformation than anything else and I think its my responsibility to point that out. I am not out of place. Investigations depend on evidence not your BS opinion.

0
2

[–] wannabe101 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

claps hands slowly... an excellent and typical response to imply that these speculations arent rational nor being approached rationally, great attempt to discredit some great insights and speculations based on EVIDENCE supplied by comet pizza itself and its circle of friends , who, obviously are all too fucking blind to see that their threads/comments/interests/common imagery/interests are all appearing to imply an underlying pedo theme? those are some stupid fuck parents and employees who choose to associate themselves and their kids wth people/employers who delight in ped and twisted fuck imagery. damn think about it for a sec mr 'rational'. would you take yr kids to a place whose owner chooses to portray himself and his business this way?

0
1

[–] Prepper_Jack 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Well, I've been on pizzagate from very early on (albeit under a different guise). I have, actually looked at most of the evidence. I have actually contributed to the investigation. Unlike you. We know these people often speak in code. We know they enjoy double meanings. We know they enjoy thinking they are smarter than everyone else. We KNOW Podesta is a freak. We KNOW he uses code words in his emails. We know he engages in occultism, and surrounds himself with people who do the same.

We aren't trying to prove any of this at all, as it's pretty firmly established at this point. If you missed any of that, this would indicate that either you haven't read much about the investigation at all, or are just here to shill. So, if you're actually interested in helping, go read a bit about it all, and maybe do some digging of your own. If not, then fuck off. My opinion on this is informed, unlike yours. Is it unlike him that he would smugly put out an occult reference under the guise of something else? Those in the know would say no. You have to pay attention to when occultists flash numbers and symbols.

The only question is whether or not it's important to the investigation. I would say no, as it offers us nothing in the way of new leads.