Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] piratse 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Two things come to mind: 1) coincidence. A LOT of companies have logos that look like the pedo logo. That triangle and hand in hand was around before pedos adopted it. The images come up a lot if you look around. Did ALL the companies connected have pedo logos? If not then why only some? because it could just be that sometimes those logos are used and some were bound to be used in companies connected to Washington elite. 2) They use it on physical locations because people GO THERE. It would be very stupid for a politician involved to wear a necklace that signified being a pedo, but the place he's told to go is verifiable by the logo. It's a marker. But a person using it to mark themselves is very easy to use as evidence and considering how smart these people are about it, I doubt they would invite the scrutiny on purpose.
these are my opinions and I fully accept I could be wrong. I love to discuss the potential of what is found because the what if is fun, but to push the "investigation" to a point where it's both believable and factual to the average person, we have to weed out this kind of shit that we can't prove and it's all conjecture. We can use it to get to the next thing. But going down the rabbit hole while getting no evidence is never going to get us anywhere.
[–] party1981 3 points -2 points 1 point (+1|-3) ago (edited ago)
You like to argue. Nobody is saying that we can prove that the fish/Podesta picture proves that pizzagate is real. We're saying that all of the evidence (1000 items of circumstantial evidence), when taken as a whole, justify serious further investigation. And, based on this mountain of evidence, we cannot assume that Podesta wasn't winking at the camera. Maybe he was talking about oceans. Probably he was talking about oceans. Or maybe he was winking at the camera, signaling an allegiance to a creepy occult cannibal group that he is a member with together with his brother Tony, who hangs Dahlmer statutes in his home and gives cannibal paintings to his brother for his office. Maybe.