Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] piratse 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Okay, to what end does this do anything for him? If he's in a pedo ring, he doesn't need to post pictures to twitter, make a matching document, post it to his website, attach it to a charity.... so he can communicate with the people he already knows? He can call them, send an email, meet them at the next fuck party. Even if you are correct, there isn't a clear enough connection here. It's just speculation and interpretation. You can build the Everest of speculation, and it will do nothing. They had to get Capone on tax evasion because they only had speculation of his criminal activity. Get the proof. the rest is a circle jerk to confirm your suspicion.
[–] wannabe101 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago (edited ago)
he wouldn't post pics to communicate his ped conquests, but to boast of and celebrate them. just as that majestic ape front person seems to boast of ' we all have preferences' immediately after a reference to liking little boys and girls was made by some musically challenged tone deaf jerkoff in the audience in that vid of majestic apes performance at comet pizza on youtube.
[–] party1981 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I completely agree with you that it is not hard proof. I'm not suggesting otherwise. One last thing to consider: even if he is referring to oceans, how bizarre is it to write symbols on your palms, hold them up with a creepy grin, take a picture, and post it to Twitter? I look at documents, memos, etc., and I never draw symbols on my palms about them and then tweet a picture of my palm symbols. Even if he's just referring to oceans, it's still fucking weird. And that weirdness itself is a clue.
[–] piratse 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
You also don't run a giant charity that does publicity. I'm not saying it's super normal but it's also not that weird. Likely "hey we should draw that on your hands and totally post it to twitter, it will be awesome." Creepy grin is just his grin, irrelevant. Posting it to twitter is the thing that makes it the least likely to be anything nefarious. Hes ALREADY IN a secret group (supposedly) there is NO REASON he would post it to signify some occult shit. The people in the group already know he's in. It would serve ZERO purpose to any pedo ring, but it would service a purpose to his shitty clean water initiative. I'm choosing the most logical one. Not everything is a signal.
[–] ManWithTheUmbrella ago
For real...so much bs speculation.
[–] shitflea ago
for real so much bs shilling
[–] wannabe101 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
every case begins wth evidence and speculation. there is an underlying theme here, and that theme is pedo. its no stretch to see the picture taking focus when all these variables are taken together.we will see then wont we. if that picture continues to focus into a precise image , or if it dissolves and ends up being a HUGE misunderstanding. and if it does dissolve and end up being nothing after all, which I highly doubt, maybe all you shill pedos reading these threads wont be so fucking stupid and maybe see the terrible message and overall impression you gave to the public