You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
4

[–] Diogenes_The_Cynic 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

http://snoopsnoo.com/u/meghanam

Looks legit, at least one name is a mod.

0
4

[–] SnorlackJack 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I seriously think this is Zoe Quinn. With the recent leak (unverified) I am having my doubts on everything with that website.

http://archive.is/ZmULb

0
6

[–] Gorillion 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Ha. Wouldn't surprise me. She's a human STD.

0
0

[–] PieceOfgate 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

How does one name being the same as a mod validate this screen cap?

I could see this happening, but someone could have easily just used the same name to try and stir shit up.

0
4

[–] 7ooo7 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The reason these screenshots pass the smell test, at least for me, is because the different participants speak to each other in very different ways and refer to very personal quirks and details about each other (plus, the conversation is all over the place). It is way too organic to be faked. Even if several determined individuals were trying to fabricate something like this, it would come across as stilted and scripted.

There is just something about the way they are speaking back and forth and over each other that rings true. You see this in any discussion thread with a limited number of participants who know each other well (or at least are part of the same cohort).

Also, it is extremely difficult to simulate all the different variety in writing styles and sense of humor exhibited by the various participants.

0
1

[–] Diogenes_The_Cynic 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

The way my bullshit detector works is by looking at specific versus generic details. This is a specific detail, and its also falsifiable, meaning we have the ability to look it up and see its truth value.