PART ONE OF THREE.
Ok guys, I am going to point out some Q&A from FBIAnon on 4chan that hasn't been explored in relations to Pizzagate. There were 7 Q&As (that I know of) over about a 4 ½ month period, early July to very late October.
It is very long, so I have to do it in multiple parts.
WATCH FOR “Forum Slide” ON THIS ONE. (If you don't know what “forum slide” is, look it up.)
But first, the TL;DR
TL;DR: FBIAnon alludes to all of the following having connections to pizzagate:
1) Search the e-mails for the following code words: cards, favors, extras, officers
2) George Soros' connection to Tavistock Institute, and their connection to the Clinton Foundation.
3) “London Connection” to CF
4) Saudi Arabia and Qatar connections to CF
5) State Department officials who donated to the CF
6) The Bonner Group
7) Henry Paulson, TARP, major bank that went under as a result of TARP
9) CF investment deals in Africa, specifically countries that have poor records of births
10) Accounting firm who did the books for Haiti's earthquake relief
11) Majescor company
12) Muhammad Yunus (warning: it is inferred that FBIAnon thought this one would be very dangerous)
13) Scalia's murder, what he was looking into when he died, and it's relation to the CF.
14) FOIA (Freedom Of Information Act) on Monsanto, GMO, and HRC. (No idea why FBIAnon thought this was important.)
15) Mark Lamont Hill
16) Barack Obama Foundation, and O'bummer's brother.
17) Projects funded by the CF, where the receiver was small, in a failing industry, and who had people owning/working for it that donated to the CF
18) A “certain Indian businessman” who has been “routinely accused of pedophilia”
19) Cheryl Mills (and where she worked before joining the CF)
20) “Gates, Buffett, Soros, African kings, the Royal family”
21) Elisa Lam (unsure about this one, may not be related)
22) “Zika, Abbot Labs, Gilead” (may be red-herring, or related to population control)
23) Helge Traasdahl/Tapad (may only be connected to election rigging)
24) The Cohen Group
25) Brookings Institute/2014 CHARGE projects
26) The company that put together the advertisement for HRC with all Avenger celebrities.
27) “What constitutes Mark Cuban's net worth?”
28) Lester Holt is a journalist who can be trusted (according to FBIAnon)
29) ALL members of the GOP who lead the “coup” against Trump.
30) Dirty money funneling to CF via 501(c)4, 527, and 4847(a)1 companies/trusts/foundations
31) State Department officials who met in secret with foreign officials
32) “Who is affiliated with the BoD for M Partners, and do they have ties to the CF?”
33) Was the TPP fast-tracked to aid in transporting children across the Pacific? (totally stolen personal idea from an associate.)
I hate leaving it at 33, because of the connotations of that number, but I can't think of anything else to put in or leave out. Sorry.
I will put the question by 4chan Anons like this: “Question: Question by 4chan”
The answers by FBIAnon will be “FBIAnon: Answer by FBIAnon”
Any of my comments in the quotes will be in parenthesis, like so: “(My incredibly astute comment)”
All of the full questions and answers were put together by someone else, I just make the link available to you. https://mega.nz/#!GlRkhbTT!bsjwIdm6QBtcM5YOxZtfxUvNlAPkn1Vp0BAvQxeSfmk
(Edit: First two pages of this doc: https://sli.mg/5P38Su https://sli.mg/siM6Lg )
Remember, FBIAnon says he will mix bullshit with truth, so he will have plausible deniability in case he is suspected of leaking info.
To begin, know that you are experiencing pushback not just from the bad guys, but from the good guys as well. Why?
Question: “>the entire government to be brought down >I very much doubt this. “
FBIAnon: “She has SAP level programs on her server, which if made public, would literally cause an uprising and possibly foreign declarations of war. “
Question: (Anon user quoting FBIAnon) ““There is intense pressure for us not to do so. I am posting from a position of near anonymity and enough plausible deniability to evade prosecution, as we have all been given gag orders. There is enough for her and the entire government
to be brought down. People do not realize how enormous this whole situation actually is. Whether she will be or not depends on how much info about others involved gets out, and there are a lot of people involved.”
(Anon's Question:) “Fuck you for not doing your duty to the people, you jaded amoral fucks. You’ve blown what little trust I had left that there were still decent patriots left in the government. You fuckers are gonna let the biggest, most corrupt cunt take the highest office in the land. You think that won’t bring this country down? Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you”
FBIAnon: “I will put it to you this way: You have three choices:
A) Turn over all of the information to the DOJ, make public a recommendation, the truth
comes out, the entire world realizes how much the US is meddling in foreign affairs and
we go to war. The civilian population realizes how much foreign money influences out
government, and a civil war begins.
B) You cherry-pick the data to implicate the people already in the eye of public opinion, so
the chips fall on the heads of a select few and the whole system does not crash.
C) You do nothing and watch the unstable political climate to gauge how you will respond.
I am confident if Trump wins she will be going to jail”
Question: “At bare minimum, you need to do B. If you can’t at least make examples of people, the
existence of the FBI is pointless. Start with the most corrupt, like Clinton (and, I presume Feinstein), and each year, choose 3-5 new people with any level of power to indict. Do this until people start
retiring. Don’t RICO the entire federal government. You have the option to do it slowly, so do it
FBIAnon: “But if we do it slowly, people like you will get mad that we are not working fast enough.”
Question: “Could the release of this information cause a Civil War in the USA? Leak it. Do it. The day of the rope is nigh”
If the above is true, the good guys are stuck between a rock and a hard place. If they expose it all at once, we get war with foreign countries, as well as civil war. I'm not saying they are right or wrong in their assessment, only that this is what the good guys in government believe.
So, don't be discouraged that you are experiencing censorship from all sides. Keep at it! What is your inducement to keep at it (aside from saving those poor kids)? This.
Question: “...Has /pol/ ever found out anything that the FBI didn't know before the FBI did?”
Things will change on January 20th. If not, there's always this: https://mega.nz/#!mspAzSpZ!LraJDYVt7S9t3j0ZQcxwQ66wU6GeOWPOqHscYqpOFec (Edit: first two pages of this doc: https://sli.mg/GZ8Vcg https://sli.mg/HzmLRx )
Now that I have laid a little foundation, we get to the parts that are related to Pizzatgate.
Question: “Simply put. Soros owns Tavistock. Tavistock owns the government. ...”
FBIAnon: “Someone is on to something.” (IMO, This means that Soros and Tavistock Institute is wrapped up in Pizzagate as well.)
Question: “Ok. Do tell. What about the human trafficking? I assume that those who can be indicted
FBIAnon: “Pedophiles and sex traffickers everywhere. Many politicians trade girls like cattle.”
(We are looking at top-level politicians in this. Congress, Federal Judges, FBI agents, CIA/NSA agents, police officers, local, state, and federal. Don't just limit the investigation to guys who own pizza joints.)
Some of you who have tried contacting police are getting blown out. Here is why.
Question: “I want to believe you, Anon…What are the chances that the army will go along with Obama’s call to martial law? Do you know anything about how the military department feels about it?”
FBIAnon: “Red team planner. Military will defect in large numbers should they be compelled to act against their own population. However, the police will not. They are not trained to reasonably react to a situation, only to follow objectives and pursue targets. It is a very different mentality from the military, hence the militarization of the police. They are to be feared.”
Question: “... Are there any more places to focus on? ...”
FBIAnon: “… 4- The London connection, not enough attention to Saudi Arabia, Qatar breakthroughs are a focal point. ...” (Remember the twitter girl named Molly? And how she said a lot of the child porn featured Arabs? Connect those back to the Clinton Foundation.)