You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
4

[–] UlyssesMcGill 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

You've misinterpreted my question. Your formatting leads me to believe your anger has slightly clouded your vision.

You're viewing the dynamic between Mel and Wife-10kids.

She doesn't need to incentivize him to make ten MORE kids with him.

She needs to incentivize him to spend time with the EXISTING ten kids. Which would in turn yield endless grand-children and great-grandchildren.

My argument was not for or against traditional values, or whether or not Mel is upholding them.

I was pointing out that you were incorrect in identifying the Matriarch's necessary means for achieving the correctly identified goal: Keep Mel around.

2
5

[–] Helena73 2 points 5 points (+7|-2) ago 

you were incorrect in identifying the Matriarch's necessary means for achieving the correctly identified goal:

Not sure what means you think I misidentified. The means for keeping the dog from straying or for discouraging homewreckers, is social taboo, public infamy.

But the real fallout of this sort of situation is that all women everywhere see this and say there is no justice for the abandon wife who has stretched out her uterus ten times for this jackass, zero repercussions for him— it does not pay to have 10 kids and stay with a bum, it does not pay to have 2 kids. If you get pregnant abort it or just sue him for child support. Bleed him for whatever you can. Because if you enter into a marriage contract in good faith this is what you can expect.

It really doesnt matter what Mrs Gibson can get out of Mel at this point. No one will get married if they are going to be treated like garbage. It’s the fuckin precedent.

This is how a great wave of divorces happened in the 70s and 80s, guys tired of the old ball and chain just walked out and found a new piece of ass. Its what happened to a lot of the parents of the kids I went to school with. The guy got a new wife.

Men are 50% responsible for feminism and the deplorable state of sexual politics today. The zoomers don’t remember how we got here but I do. The men wanted to be free. The men wanted no strings attached. Here we are.

0
3

[–] HiJoker 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Thank you for encapsulating the whore mentality of how the pussy is a factory and women want paid for it either if it's making babies or sexing a dick.

Nope, sorry, it's going to be back to being property with the lot of you. This is another jewed up experiment that ran off the rails and died.

There's a good lass for pointing that out, now run along now and make tasty sandwiches.

0
2

[–] NoBS 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The men wanted to be free. The men wanted no strings attached. Here we are.

Liberated woman used to be a free choice, now it is mandate set in public ridicule.

Do you know why some traditionalist woman did not want the right to vote? Because it at first demanded the privilege of dying for freedom with the included draft or service.

Today any criminally insane leech can vote, so it was a wash anyway.

0
0

[–] tokui ago 

Take your man hate and go home to your cats.

0
0

[–] Angryelectrician ago 

dont be a slut maker

0
0

[–] UlyssesMcGill ago 

How many females have you had sex with?

How long have you been with your current partner?

I wouldn't ask this, but you've entered this conversation judgmentally, and as such, must reveal your own honor before I even stoop as low as to defend myself from your unfounded and unnecessary advice.