Archived Good ol' Uncle Mel, rubbing it in without even trying. (files.catbox.moe)
submitted ago by Splooge
Posted by: Splooge
Posting time: 7 months ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 9/5/2020 10:00:00 AM
Views: 2308
SCP: 272
274 upvotes, 2 downvotes (99% upvoted it)
Archived Good ol' Uncle Mel, rubbing it in without even trying. (files.catbox.moe)
submitted ago by Splooge
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Helena73 1 point 11 points 12 points (+12|-1) ago
Oh no reason it’s just that this sort of thing was......
THE JUSTIFICATION FOR WELFARE
THE JUSTIFICATION FOR ALIMONY
THE JUSTIFICATION FOR CAREER WOMEN
THE JUSTIFICATION FOR ABORTION
THE JUSTIFICATION FOR FEMINISM
THE JUSTIFICATION FOR BIRTH CONTROL
The plight of penniless abandon women with 10 kids was the impetus for all of those things
Condemn it, criminalize it, and you may incentivize some women to return to the home and bear and raise your children. You are really not in a position to dictate right now are you?
[–] Bremertonbruiser 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Interesting. The Apostle Peter gathers young men of the church together to care for widows...I wonder was he preventing just such a thing. I'm still with my highschool sweetheart by the way.
[–] Helena73 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
Of course. The church was in charge if all this stuff. But you didnt get shit if you were an unrepentant entitled whore telling other people they owed you just for drawing breath.
There is no accountability for bad actors today or even a way for good actors to confirm that their “charity” ie forced taxation is going to anyone worthy of it.
P.s.- good for you, she’s / he’s lucky to have you!
[–] UlyssesMcGill 1 point 4 points 5 points (+5|-1) ago
You've misinterpreted my question. Your formatting leads me to believe your anger has slightly clouded your vision.
You're viewing the dynamic between Mel and Wife-10kids.
She doesn't need to incentivize him to make ten MORE kids with him.
She needs to incentivize him to spend time with the EXISTING ten kids. Which would in turn yield endless grand-children and great-grandchildren.
My argument was not for or against traditional values, or whether or not Mel is upholding them.
I was pointing out that you were incorrect in identifying the Matriarch's necessary means for achieving the correctly identified goal: Keep Mel around.
[–] Helena73 2 points 5 points 7 points (+7|-2) ago
Not sure what means you think I misidentified. The means for keeping the dog from straying or for discouraging homewreckers, is social taboo, public infamy.
But the real fallout of this sort of situation is that all women everywhere see this and say there is no justice for the abandon wife who has stretched out her uterus ten times for this jackass, zero repercussions for him— it does not pay to have 10 kids and stay with a bum, it does not pay to have 2 kids. If you get pregnant abort it or just sue him for child support. Bleed him for whatever you can. Because if you enter into a marriage contract in good faith this is what you can expect.
It really doesnt matter what Mrs Gibson can get out of Mel at this point. No one will get married if they are going to be treated like garbage. It’s the fuckin precedent.
This is how a great wave of divorces happened in the 70s and 80s, guys tired of the old ball and chain just walked out and found a new piece of ass. Its what happened to a lot of the parents of the kids I went to school with. The guy got a new wife.
Men are 50% responsible for feminism and the deplorable state of sexual politics today. The zoomers don’t remember how we got here but I do. The men wanted to be free. The men wanted no strings attached. Here we are.
[–] Angryelectrician ago
dont be a slut maker
[–] NoBS 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Not one of Mels kids are hurting for money. Not one of his kids are sucking on the governments teat. Not one of his kids was programmed from public education abuse. Disposable wives happen because they get fat, lazy or entitled.
[–] Helena73 2 points 1 point 3 points (+3|-2) ago
So morals are only for poor people. Rich men can shit on the institution of marriage. Yours sounds like a great society, where do I sign up?
Disposable wives happen because men thought they could have their cake and eat it and every guy could be a polygamist. But the math doesnt work out. Polygamists build hellworld societies like Islam and Hollywood. Enforced monogamy is the way of the civilized strong european family.