You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
5

[–] UlyssesMcGill 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Why would he need to incentivize her to make 10 babies for him?

She already did.

1
11

[–] Helena73 1 point 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

Oh no reason it’s just that this sort of thing was......

THE JUSTIFICATION FOR WELFARE

THE JUSTIFICATION FOR ALIMONY

THE JUSTIFICATION FOR CAREER WOMEN

THE JUSTIFICATION FOR ABORTION

THE JUSTIFICATION FOR FEMINISM

THE JUSTIFICATION FOR BIRTH CONTROL

The plight of penniless abandon women with 10 kids was the impetus for all of those things

Condemn it, criminalize it, and you may incentivize some women to return to the home and bear and raise your children. You are really not in a position to dictate right now are you?

0
5

[–] Bremertonbruiser 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Interesting. The Apostle Peter gathers young men of the church together to care for widows...I wonder was he preventing just such a thing. I'm still with my highschool sweetheart by the way.

1
4

[–] UlyssesMcGill 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

You've misinterpreted my question. Your formatting leads me to believe your anger has slightly clouded your vision.

You're viewing the dynamic between Mel and Wife-10kids.

She doesn't need to incentivize him to make ten MORE kids with him.

She needs to incentivize him to spend time with the EXISTING ten kids. Which would in turn yield endless grand-children and great-grandchildren.

My argument was not for or against traditional values, or whether or not Mel is upholding them.

I was pointing out that you were incorrect in identifying the Matriarch's necessary means for achieving the correctly identified goal: Keep Mel around.

0
3

[–] NoBS 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Not one of Mels kids are hurting for money. Not one of his kids are sucking on the governments teat. Not one of his kids was programmed from public education abuse. Disposable wives happen because they get fat, lazy or entitled.