You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
15

[–] Helena73 2 points 15 points (+17|-2) ago 

Bruce Jenner should be horse whipped, first and foremost for those whores he’s set loose on the world. But let’s not forget that tho Mel talks a good trad game, he is a whore who abandoned his real wife, who loyally bore him 10 kids and stayed with his drunken crazy ass till he ran off with that slavic gold digger timothy dalton sloppy second. After he made a baby with that witch, he’s off to make more with this little scammer. He does not walk the walk.

Females have zero incentive to make 10 babies for you if you fuck off to bang 25 year olds.

0
5

[–] UlyssesMcGill 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Why would he need to incentivize her to make 10 babies for him?

She already did.

1
11

[–] Helena73 1 point 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

Oh no reason it’s just that this sort of thing was......

THE JUSTIFICATION FOR WELFARE

THE JUSTIFICATION FOR ALIMONY

THE JUSTIFICATION FOR CAREER WOMEN

THE JUSTIFICATION FOR ABORTION

THE JUSTIFICATION FOR FEMINISM

THE JUSTIFICATION FOR BIRTH CONTROL

The plight of penniless abandon women with 10 kids was the impetus for all of those things

Condemn it, criminalize it, and you may incentivize some women to return to the home and bear and raise your children. You are really not in a position to dictate right now are you?

0
4

[–] 86USSLiberty 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I won’t pretend to know his marriage. But say what you will ,he’s still making white babies with new women. Couldn’t do that if he was still with her.

3
7

[–] Helena73 3 points 7 points (+10|-3) ago 

He would make a great muslim. But as a catholic he is an adulterer and a hypocrite. Successful societies are based on consistent rules that people can depend on. European women (and men) have relied on enforced monogamy as the stable economic unit of our civilization for millenia. Liberalization of moral behavior in the 20th century led to an increase in men whoring, which led to “social reforms” to guarantee the economic security of single moms which incentivized the behaviors which led to this disaster.

If you are going to suggest that your rule is polygamy, I quit your revolution. If you are going to suggest that your rule is monogamy but we’ll break it whenever we feel like, you don’t even have a revolution, you have Hollywood California, you’re the fucking problem.

No more divorce. No more adultery. No more abortion. No more alimony. No more welfare moms.

0
1

[–] ManchesterT 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The only way a 25-yr old is going to bang a dad with ten (actually seven) kids, is if he's absolutely swimming in cash.

If he's swimming in cash, the first woman is going to make out like a bandit in divorce court. She filed first and she walked with $400M. I wouldn't call that, "zero incentive".