You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[–]Whitworth0 points
2 points
2 points
(+2|-0)
ago
Because of camera shutter speeds. A slow shutter speed let’s in more light which can overexpose brightly lit objects. The satellite is well lit by the sun, so a faster shutter speed limits the light getting in. The stars are so dim in the background they don’t get picked up in the photo. You can do this experiment yourself. Just take a picture of any brightly lit object with the night sky in the background. No stars
[+]ADaniels0 points0 points0 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]ADaniels0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
Because the light source close-by drowns out all the background light, just like how you can’t see stars at night in the bright downtown city, or in the daytime.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Liber ago
I’m no flat earthier, but where are the stars? All of these sorts of pictures have no stars in them..
[–] Whitworth 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Because of camera shutter speeds. A slow shutter speed let’s in more light which can overexpose brightly lit objects. The satellite is well lit by the sun, so a faster shutter speed limits the light getting in. The stars are so dim in the background they don’t get picked up in the photo. You can do this experiment yourself. Just take a picture of any brightly lit object with the night sky in the background. No stars
[–] Liber ago
Well that's new for me, I had no idea this was the case
[–] ADaniels ago (edited ago)
Because the light source close-by drowns out all the background light, just like how you can’t see stars at night in the bright downtown city, or in the daytime.