2
26

[–] ADaniels 2 points 26 points (+28|-2) ago 

The wrinkles on her foot suggest she is older imo

[–] [deleted] 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

1
-1

[–] Oy2TheVey 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

“The fact that this is upvoted without any objective scrutinization of these so-called measurements is the reason why people dismiss voat as nothing but tin foil hat conspiracy theorist.”

Seems more like christian/republican isis, or “moderate” christians are running voat, and how obviously they remain ignorant of how they treat non christians.

7
-3

[–] sore_ass_losers 7 points -3 points (+4|-7) ago 

The undeveloped musculature of the legs, the tiny feet, suggest a child to me.

0
24

[–] Octocopter 0 points 24 points (+24|-0) ago 

That also does not take into account the angle of the leg if it is parallel to the camera or angled coming towards it. While it is suspicious I don't see it as damning undeniable proof.

1
1

[–] ShinyVoater 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

The leg's definitely at an angle. Being fairly conservative and assuming that's three inches lost,

 10 + 3 = 13
13 * 4.88 = 63.44

So a little over five foot two.

2
-2

[–] clamhurt_legbeard 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Losing 30% of her leg length would require an exteme 60 degree tilt towards the camera. We obviously do not have such a tilt, so your math is off.

Given the height of women and is girl's calculated height (which is over 5 standard deviations outside the norm for an adult) there is a 0.0000573303% chance that she isn't a little girl.

Tarantino is sucking on a little girl's foot.

1
14

[–] idiopathic 1 points 14 points (+15|-1) ago 

Height doesn't determine age.

1
-1

[–] clamhurt_legbeard 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

She's five standard deviations outside the norm for an adult female.

There's a 0.0000573303% chance she's an adult.

Tarantino is a pedophile.

9
-6

0
10

[–] riposte 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Per spec tive. If you haven’t heard of forced perspective then I have a great picture showing when I caught the worlds largest salmon and another of a horse sized duck.

What direction is the leg facing? Yeah, she’s farther away and thus smaller.

0
7

[–] spookybm 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Either 6 to 8 years old.. .or he likes them short tiny vietnamese bitchese.

4
-3

[–] clamhurt_legbeard 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago 

The average Vietnamese woman is 5'0" tall.

Still quite a bit more than 48 inches.

0
0

[–] Proxima 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Yah but that means nothing. Just because its the AVERAGE doesnt mean there are letite adults that are 48" tall lol. You realize there are 7billion people right? Try to think critically.

5
-5

1
5

[–] green_man 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

The problem with this pic he is holding the statue out so there is no accurate way to determine the height of his face unless you knew the exact camera settings used (see focal length and forced perspective, maybe a photography goat can explain this better). You might want to go find a full body shot and recalculate, the internet says he's 6'1".

1
0

[–] Proxima 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

youre right. Lens distortion. A wide lens (something of a low mm like 12mm) will have a much much different distortion than a narrow field of view lens, like an 85mm or telephoto.

0
4

[–] ToFat2Fish 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I confess it was my leg.

0
2

[–] sore_ass_losers 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

How was it?

0
2

[–] ToFat2Fish 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Not bad but my leg smelled like Lucy lu for 2 weeks after

0
1

[–] Proxima 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

This makes voat look bad. That women is not fucking 8 years old,

Youre not taking into account things like LENS DISTORTION

load more comments ▼ (5 remaining)