0
3

[–] gnosticmike 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I own one of her books. If it is on sale at Amazon, in public view, and it adheres to the legal status of the day (and is upheld as well,) then these books of photos by her is art. What's disturbing, like the poster above said, is that The New York Times is advising people what is "disturbing."

0
3

[–] nroslm [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

My photography teacher once mentioned her and she does have more intimate photos then displayed in the article yet I fail to find anything off putting about the images. To decry such photographs as 'disturbing', especially by a reputable source such as NYT, shows just how far into fear and distrust we have fallen as a nation and culture.