You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] 1nsidious [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I just created the subverse under your first suggestion. Regarding your second statement, sorry, got a little ahead of myself.

0
3

[–] 1129005? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I guess your first two choices were a false dichotomy.

0
1

[–] 1nsidious [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Haha yes

0
1

[–] TrivialGravitas 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I would actually reccomend against v/fallacies, that just encourages the logicians fallacy :)

But more seriously, it does continue an attitude that logical fallacies are damning, when in reality the whole of science basically operates on a big one: (A->B) ^ (A->C) ^ (A->D) ->(B^C^D->A) basically describes the process of experimental falsification, and is completely invalid logically. v/rhetoric works better.

0
0

[–] 1nsidious [S] ago 

Lol okay

0
0

[–] totally_an_admin ago 

Is there somewhere I could go to have that fallacy that you mentioned spelled out a bit more? Sorry, I'm a bit of a pleb in the world of logical fallacy.