You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →


[–] edgelord666 5 points -3 points (+2|-5) ago 

It's almost like, and bear with me, law enforcement should carry but not civilians. He is protected by law enforcement, who should carry, beause THEY'RE LAW ENFORCEMENT. Why are you rebublicucks so bad at logic? Honestly, were you all born to poor families? Or at least most of you?


[–] J_Darnley 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

One of the courts in America ruled that the police have no duty to protect you. That alone should tell you why everyone should be armed. On another point: are the police not civilians? Are they somehow better then the rest of the populace? Is that why they alone should be armed?


[–] GoogleHatesVoat 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Let me answer that one for you, it goes over the head of most people because cops tend not to like the idea getting around. The police are not men and women as soon as they get that badge. THEY ARE THE JURISDICTION. Think of them, like judges and mayors, as walking, talking cities and towns, counties, states and nations. What do all those have in common? They are sovereign. They can arrest, jail, seize, destroy and kill to protect themselves from harm. Any harm. Even if it is simply perceived at a certain moment in time. When you are talking to a cop, you are talking to the most dangerous of things. Yes Sir, no Sir. It really means Sire, for they own all that is found on their land and you had better never forget it.


[–] toobaditworks 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

But excuse me while I dive into 'the police kill people at random because of their skin color' but yes let's only allow them all guns.

You have no idea what the powers that be have planned for the weak and unarmed populous of the world. And ignoring history and wars you are a fucking retarded piece of shit fucking left to rot on the sidewalks of a collectivists wet dream. A sad and lonely place that we will never surrender to.

Disarming a populous .... it only comes to one thing. You are not fooling anyone. We are going to disarm you.


[–] edgelord666 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

you have no idea what the powers that be have planned for the weak and unarmed populous of the world.

neither do you, stop spouting consipracy bullshit like they're facts


[–] ProgNaziGator 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Also that's a very city centric view you have. Much of this countries population live in places where there are not full time police or even those within half hour + of our homes. Ice lived in places where there are no police on weekends.

Also rural don't have your pets but they have nature. Bear breaks into your house stays eating your family you gonna wait 6 hours for cops to arrive?

! Common are animals with rabies. Kids are out playing in the grass and racoon is watching them from the weeds but it's day time?

So yes even if cops and government were 100% trustworthy in nature people still need to protect themselves.

I write these examples or for you to understand why people in flyover areas, you know the ones that grow and raise all your food live much more reality based life then your sheltered city existence which bytheway only exists because someone else with guns previously purged reality from your neighborhood.

Weakness, dependence, passivity are not virtues. They are selfish temporary luxuries and decedances afforded you by those before you that lived hard realities and those after you that will live hard realities.


[–] ProgNaziGator 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Were you here for black lives matters? Thought cops weren't to be trusted.

  1. Those are law enforcement but these hypocrites do the same with bodyguards who aren't law enforcement. None of have bodyguards to protect us from your pets playing a game of knockout.